Lap Bomber???

FluffyMcDeath

Active Member
Member
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,256
Reaction score
2,693
I dunno. I'm not buying the "Lap Bomber" thing. It's just not catchy enough. The underwear bomber? Nah! It needs more zip, more pizzazz ...

i'm thinking:

CROTCH BOMBER!!

(watch out for his burning loins)
 
AL Qaeda has embarked on a new campaign of underpant-based terror and improvised exploding knickers, experts warned last night.

As Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was charged with demolishing his testicles on board a Detroit-bound passenger jet, security analysts called for all international airports to be fitted with exploding underpants detectors.

Tom Logan, of the Institute for Studies, said: "Be on the look out for things like ticking crotches or an unusual bulge. It may look like a courgette, a powerful erection or possibly even a packet of Fruit Pastilles strapped to the inner thigh.

"If you are sitting on a plane or a train and the man next to you has what looks like an engorged penis, you must punch him in the groin as hard as you possibly can and then blow your whistle."

The US and UK governments are now drafting emergency legislation that will allow police to stop people like you in the street and demand the immediate surrender of your trousers.

If you refuse, an underpant disposal robot will grab the waistband of your nether-garments and pull at it until the leg holes are half way up your back. Police sources said the waistband could even be pulled over your head, particularly in heightened security environments such as the Olympics or Trooping the Colour.

Logan added: "If at that stage your genitals do not explode, your underpants will be wedged so deeply into your bottom crack it'll make waterboarding seem like chocolate-coated hand relief."

Meanwhile Julian Cook, professor of Islamic Studies at Reading University, said Al Qaeda's new tactic seemed to be at odds with the theological underpinnings of militant jihadism, adding: "One suspects the 72 virgins are going to be somewhat redundant if you arrive in paradise having blown your own cock off."

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
 
I dunno, it seems a little too soon to be making fun of the attempted murder of plane full of people. That said, it is a little odd that an "rich boy" al Qaeda terrorist going to school in Londonistan, attempting to murder hundreds of passengers on an american flight, gets foiled by a Dutch tourist.

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/65 ... &ATTR=News
 
redrumloa said:
I dunno, it seems a little too soon to be making fun of the attempted murder of plane full of people.

Soon?
It's from a satirical news site but you want them to wait until it's no longer news.

Jokes are fair game so long as you choose the topic, be it murder, sex, mental illness, etc?
 
Robert said:
Jokes are fair game so long as you choose the topic, be it murder, sex, mental illness, etc?

So you are saying you don't see the difference between:

A: Jokes about Tiger Woods bumping uglies with a middle aged diner waitress.

B: 9/11 jumper jokes on the evening of 9/11/01.

Please note I didn't say it was wrong or you were evil, just a little soon (for my taste being implied).
 
As I already tried to point out, a satirical news site ceases to function if you wait until it's no longer news.
 
redrumloa said:
So you are saying you don't see the difference between:

A: Jokes about Tiger Woods bumping uglies with a middle aged diner waitress.

B: 9/11 jumper jokes on the evening of 9/11/01.

Tiger was better material. 9/11 just didn't work. On the other hand, the Challenger disaster had two or three good jokes going around almost right away.

I remember when the roof parking lot of a supermarket collapsed in Vancouver killing a couple of pensioners in the vegetable section. It seemed to have so much potential, but strangely enough nothing could be made of it. Sometimes the ingredients don't mix. It's not so much a matter of time or decency but whether a joke can gel.

Tiger had so many angles to come at from the "Tiger is a Lion Cheetah"
angle to all the wonderful world of puns already inherent in golf, play it where it lies, moving your balls and taking the extra strokes. I personally wanted to see more women come forward. I'd be disappointed if he didn't play 18 holes. And while his putting game is superb he really needs to work on his driving.

Meanwhile - annoyed at the ever diminishing size of airplane snacks some passengers have decided to roast their own nuts.
 
now THIS is funny

and it's mostly funny because it's ridiculous, no one was in any real danger (expect the asshole who blew off his own private bits)

the only thing that isn't funny is that once again law abiding citizens will have to put up with more bullshit when traveling via planes.

I really object to being treated like a criminal when I have never even gotten a traffic ticket.
My first thought when I heard about this moron is: how did another idiot who is clearly out of his mind and (we later learn) was on a WatchList, AND his father warned the US (or someone) about his stupid son get on a {bleep} plane?

someone needs to be fired because they were asleep at the wheel
 
BTW, there's nothing funny about 9-11

and that piece of shit, falwell who made that despicable comment a week after about 3000 of my fellow human beings were killed because they had the nerve to Go To WORK - is now burning in hell for his stupid comment. I'm sure he and pat robertson thought they were being clever at the time, but I didn't laugh then or now.
 
Of course the saddest part is Bush convinced the American public to attack Iraq so we would fight the terrorists over there. Turns out the terrorists are coming from different countries than either Iraq or Afganistan.
 
faethor said:
Of course the saddest part is Bush convinced the American public to attack Iraq so we would fight the terrorists over there. Turns out the terrorists are coming from different countries than either Iraq or Afganistan.
he never convinced me
 
cecilia said:
faethor said:
Of course the saddest part is Bush convinced the American public to attack Iraq so we would fight the terrorists over there. Turns out the terrorists are coming from different countries than either Iraq or Afganistan.
he never convinced me

True but you don't have to look very far to find those he did convince.
In fact you don't even have to look beyond this website to find a bunch of them...
 
Robert said:
cecilia said:
faethor said:
Of course the saddest part is Bush convinced the American public to attack Iraq so we would fight the terrorists over there. Turns out the terrorists are coming from different countries than either Iraq or Afganistan.
he never convinced me

True but you don't have to look very far to find those he did convince.
In fact you don't even have to look beyond this website to find a bunch of them...
sad and true
 
cecilia said:
no one was in any real danger
Not sure I'd agree with that. If he knew what he was doing and the explosive went off as planned, he could have taken the plane down. He made some critical mistakes, but if he chose to trigger the explosive while over the Atlantic, while people were either sleeping or watching a movie, fire alone could have brought that plane down. An actual explosion may have also been instantly catastrophic as he was strategically located over the fuel tanks. However, choosing to do it while the plane was descending was the worst time as even if he punctured the plane's outer skin the pressure difference would have been lesser and the plane was already on it's way to landing. So I think a few lucky factors worked against the guy, but that doesn't mean people were not in danger. Eventually terrorists will learn to use more then one bomber (to increase the payload) and to detonate the explosive while they're in the privacy of the washroom while over the Atlantic. It will happen, it's just a matter of time.
 
Glaucus said:
cecilia said:
no one was in any real danger
Not sure I'd agree with that. If he knew what he was doing and the explosive went off as planned, he could have taken the plane down. He made some critical mistakes, but if he chose to trigger the explosive while over the Atlantic, while people were either sleeping or watching a movie, fire alone could have brought that plane down. An actual explosion may have also been instantly catastrophic as he was strategically located over the fuel tanks. However, choosing to do it while the plane was descending was the worst time as even if he punctured the plane's outer skin the pressure difference would have been lesser and the plane was already on it's way to landing. So I think a few lucky factors worked against the guy, but that doesn't mean people were not in danger. Eventually terrorists will learn to use more then one bomber (to increase the payload) and to detonate the explosive while they're in the privacy of the washroom while over the Atlantic. It will happen, it's just a matter of time.
heck, I'm in danger every time i cross the street.

i'm aware that this guy was a complete idiot and didn't plan out this thing At ALL. my feeling is that he's just another nut and like the shoe bomber is emotional about his delusions but doesn't really know what the hell he's doing. people like them don't plan out this in cold blood.

I really doubt guys like them are going to terrorists school to learn how to take down planes. the potential may "terrify" some people, but frankly this is just an annoyance. I'm not afraid of them.

wasting time with idiots distracts us from the more dangerous criminal. I've said for years that the way the airlines try to cull through passengers is sloppy and inefficient. this is just another example. and passengers will be even more bullied and treated like cattle.

dumb and dumber.
 
Everyone has a bomb on a plane. Short out your laptop battery.
 
Everyone has a bomb on a plane. Short out your laptop battery.
 
cecilia said:
and it's mostly funny because it's ridiculous, no one was in any real danger (expect the asshole who blew off his own private bits)
The danger was real

Abdulmutallab spent months in Yemen being trained for the Christmas Day suicide mission.
He attempted to detonate 80 grams of PETN, a secondary high explosive with a nitroglycerine primary detonator. When then primary detonator fails to transfer a shock wave to the secondary explosive, you get a very hot fire. If the detonator had functioned properly, while he was seated over the fuel tanks, the plane would have gone down.

faethor will explain to you how the flight crew has now endangered the Gaia, by discharging a CO2 fire extinguisher at high altitude

cecilia said:
I really object to being treated like a criminal when I have never even gotten a traffic ticket.
My first thought when I heard about this moron is: how did another idiot who is clearly out of his mind and (we later learn) was on a WatchList, AND his father warned the US (or someone) about his stupid son get on a {bleep} plane?

someone needs to be fired because they were asleep at the wheel

Being PC is now more important

U.S. State Department employees say such information was flagged and given high priority during the Bush Administration, but that since the Obama Administration took office, "we are encouraged to not create the appearance that we are profiling or targeting Muslims."
 
IMO we have the wrong inspection system. Out of this event they want to install 'Naked Imagers'. It's a good idea to a point. The point is they are still defeatable. So assuming technology will protect us to a 100% level is misguided.

We should look at others around the world and see how they accomplish this. Isreal is a good example of a nation that's a high terrorist target and very successful at disallowing terrorists on their planes. While they do employ technology they also talk to everyone and screen them with a discussion. I believe this would help over the 'put your bag in this box', 'wait at the scanner' we get from our security. The problem here is the cost is low and nonrecurring. I doubt the businesses the government asked for help would propse a small psych evaluation.
 
metalman said:
U.S. State Department employees say such information was flagged and given high priority during the Bush Administration, but that since the Obama Administration took office, "we are encouraged to not create the appearance that we are profiling or targeting Muslims."
Unvalidated heresay. But, let's assume it's true. Perhaps the problem is lack in leadership. Why is there a lack in leadership? GOP blocking Obama's TSA nomination Why? It appears Republicans are more worried about unionization than worried about terrorists.

What happened to the Republicans that believed the President should have whatever nominee they wanted? Ahh politics.
 
Back
Top