Liberal, feel good, PC bullcrap again

redrumloa said:
FluffyMcDeath said:
Coz he likes to beat the living snot out of the beginners. Probably wouldn't enjoy the challenge of players at his own level.

Fluffy, the boy is 9. Do you really think the Red Socks can sign him :?:

No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.
 
redrumloa said:
FluffyMcDeath said:
Coz he likes to beat the living snot out of the beginners. Probably wouldn't enjoy the challenge of players at his own level.

Fluffy, the boy is 9. Do you really think the Red Socks can sign him :?:

No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.
 
redrumloa said:
FluffyMcDeath said:
Coz he likes to beat the living snot out of the beginners. Probably wouldn't enjoy the challenge of players at his own level.

Fluffy, the boy is 9. Do you really think the Red Socks can sign him :?:

No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.
 
redrumloa said:
FluffyMcDeath said:
Coz he likes to beat the living snot out of the beginners. Probably wouldn't enjoy the challenge of players at his own level.

Fluffy, the boy is 9. Do you really think the Red Socks can sign him :?:

No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.
 
redrumloa said:
FluffyMcDeath said:
Coz he likes to beat the living snot out of the beginners. Probably wouldn't enjoy the challenge of players at his own level.

Fluffy, the boy is 9. Do you really think the Red Socks can sign him :?:

No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.
 
redrumloa said:
FluffyMcDeath said:
Coz he likes to beat the living snot out of the beginners. Probably wouldn't enjoy the challenge of players at his own level.

Fluffy, the boy is 9. Do you really think the Red Socks can sign him :?:

No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
redrumloa said:
No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.

We dont know the specifics, so we are assuming. Usually the older leagues wont take someone under their age limit. Age limits are not usually 1-2 years like you guys imply, but 4 or more. I think implying that a 14-18 league would take a 9 year old is unrealistic, nor would it be appropriate.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
redrumloa said:
No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.

We dont know the specifics, so we are assuming. Usually the older leagues wont take someone under their age limit. Age limits are not usually 1-2 years like you guys imply, but 4 or more. I think implying that a 14-18 league would take a 9 year old is unrealistic, nor would it be appropriate.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
redrumloa said:
No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.

We dont know the specifics, so we are assuming. Usually the older leagues wont take someone under their age limit. Age limits are not usually 1-2 years like you guys imply, but 4 or more. I think implying that a 14-18 league would take a 9 year old is unrealistic, nor would it be appropriate.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
redrumloa said:
No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.

We dont know the specifics, so we are assuming. Usually the older leagues wont take someone under their age limit. Age limits are not usually 1-2 years like you guys imply, but 4 or more. I think implying that a 14-18 league would take a 9 year old is unrealistic, nor would it be appropriate.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
redrumloa said:
No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.

We dont know the specifics, so we are assuming. Usually the older leagues wont take someone under their age limit. Age limits are not usually 1-2 years like you guys imply, but 4 or more. I think implying that a 14-18 league would take a 9 year old is unrealistic, nor would it be appropriate.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
redrumloa said:
No, but he should definitely be in a more senior league for his own good and the good of the league he was in.

We dont know the specifics, so we are assuming. Usually the older leagues wont take someone under their age limit. Age limits are not usually 1-2 years like you guys imply, but 4 or more. I think implying that a 14-18 league would take a 9 year old is unrealistic, nor would it be appropriate.
 
Still don't get how this could in any way be deamed "liberal".

But going back to the story: Are there not different leagues, even within the same age groups?
 
Still don't get how this could in any way be deamed "liberal".

But going back to the story: Are there not different leagues, even within the same age groups?
 
Still don't get how this could in any way be deamed "liberal".

But going back to the story: Are there not different leagues, even within the same age groups?
 
Still don't get how this could in any way be deamed "liberal".

But going back to the story: Are there not different leagues, even within the same age groups?
 
Still don't get how this could in any way be deamed "liberal".

But going back to the story: Are there not different leagues, even within the same age groups?
 
Still don't get how this could in any way be deamed "liberal".

But going back to the story: Are there not different leagues, even within the same age groups?
 
Back
Top