- Joined
- Jul 6, 2005
- Messages
- 1,707
- Reaction score
- 447
metalman said:Robert said:Dislikes:
- Health care, Obama wants socialized medicine
You think that's bad? Good grief, I'm glad I don't live in your world.
My parents grew up in a Scotland where you had to pay for medical attention. The best thing a British government ever did was socialise medicine. Yes, we still pay for it - comes straight off your wages before you get them. You won't hear many (sane) people in Scotland requesting it be switched back. Most people will bitch about their national insurance payments but if you asked them would they rather risk paying for their care should they fall ill, most would say no. More importantly, it means those less well off receive proper medical attention when they need it, without worrying about being turfed onto the street for having no money.
Our system isn't perfect, not by any means.
But it's far preferable to your system.
The National Health Service has become less efficient despite Labour pumping millions into its budget.
And you'll not hear a single person say different from this country, except possibly middle management whose positions were built on this injection.
I would also point out that the NHS isn't the only public service that has been effected by bloat. Not by a long shot.
metalman said:he National Health Service's bill for cancer drugs could swallow half of the present health budget.
Patients cannot rely on the NHS to save their lives if the cost of doing so is too great
The UK's National Health Service does not have infinite resources. Someone will have to decide whether buying drugs to keep an 80 year old "alive" for six more months or spending on a unemployed 40 year old alcoholic, or a 50 year old obese smoker, is a waste of resources. So when a person is ill and in need of treatment, their age, weight, and unhealthly lifestyle choices will determine what treatments they receive, if any.
And this is different to private health insurance, how? Are you telling me that once you hit your 80's a person's health insurance is not going to be considerably higher then it would be for that person were they in their 20's? Or that smokers have to pay more then non smokers? Pull the other one!
Your point about infinate resources is cute, but it's no different then under a purely private system, the only difference is that fewer people under the private system have any medical cover at all. Which is why the US has a birth mortality rate of a third world country, and cuba has a rate closer to European standards.
As to medicines not being available on the NHS, yes, this is so, but in this country, there is also the option of going private. Which leads us back to the point of individuals resources vs an unbrella cover by the state. There is no such thing as unlimited resource outside of a video game.