Lieberman vs Lamont

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tigger
  • Start date Start date

Will Lieberman or Lamont win the election tomorrow?

  • Lieberman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lamont

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Don't care, Republicans control the Senate anyways

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
not to mention that VERY GAY KISS with bush. hmmmmmm. :?
 
not to mention that VERY GAY KISS with bush. hmmmmmm. :?
 
faethor said:
It was right the Dems ousted him. Lately, he sounds like a Republican - whiny, defensive, and accusatory.

And the politics leading up to the (Mid Term) general election in November continues. Now we have this editorial in SLATE. Enjoy...I'm sure there is more to come.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
It was right the Dems ousted him. Lately, he sounds like a Republican - whiny, defensive, and accusatory.

And the politics leading up to the (Mid Term) general election in November continues. Now we have this editorial in SLATE. Enjoy...I'm sure there is more to come.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
It was right the Dems ousted him. Lately, he sounds like a Republican - whiny, defensive, and accusatory.

And the politics leading up to the (Mid Term) general election in November continues. Now we have this editorial in SLATE. Enjoy...I'm sure there is more to come.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
It was right the Dems ousted him. Lately, he sounds like a Republican - whiny, defensive, and accusatory.

And the politics leading up to the (Mid Term) general election in November continues. Now we have this editorial in SLATE. Enjoy...I'm sure there is more to come.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
It was right the Dems ousted him. Lately, he sounds like a Republican - whiny, defensive, and accusatory.

And the politics leading up to the (Mid Term) general election in November continues. Now we have this editorial in SLATE. Enjoy...I'm sure there is more to come.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
It was right the Dems ousted him. Lately, he sounds like a Republican - whiny, defensive, and accusatory.

And the politics leading up to the (Mid Term) general election in November continues. Now we have this editorial in SLATE. Enjoy...I'm sure there is more to come.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
There was the amusement of the Lieberman website issue? Lieberman's team claimed their website was under denial of service attack and while they had no evidence they believed it to be coming from Lamont supporters. It turns out Lieberman spent a whopping $15/month and had a 10GB limit on their website. It went over the limit and their site was shutdown since the limit was reached.

Apparently not the case. Breitbart is reporting that the Feds are in fact investigating a possible denial of service attack. Stats about the Lieberman website (and expenses) are listed in the report as well.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
There was the amusement of the Lieberman website issue? Lieberman's team claimed their website was under denial of service attack and while they had no evidence they believed it to be coming from Lamont supporters. It turns out Lieberman spent a whopping $15/month and had a 10GB limit on their website. It went over the limit and their site was shutdown since the limit was reached.

Apparently not the case. Breitbart is reporting that the Feds are in fact investigating a possible denial of service attack. Stats about the Lieberman website (and expenses) are listed in the report as well.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
There was the amusement of the Lieberman website issue? Lieberman's team claimed their website was under denial of service attack and while they had no evidence they believed it to be coming from Lamont supporters. It turns out Lieberman spent a whopping $15/month and had a 10GB limit on their website. It went over the limit and their site was shutdown since the limit was reached.

Apparently not the case. Breitbart is reporting that the Feds are in fact investigating a possible denial of service attack. Stats about the Lieberman website (and expenses) are listed in the report as well.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
There was the amusement of the Lieberman website issue? Lieberman's team claimed their website was under denial of service attack and while they had no evidence they believed it to be coming from Lamont supporters. It turns out Lieberman spent a whopping $15/month and had a 10GB limit on their website. It went over the limit and their site was shutdown since the limit was reached.

Apparently not the case. Breitbart is reporting that the Feds are in fact investigating a possible denial of service attack. Stats about the Lieberman website (and expenses) are listed in the report as well.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
There was the amusement of the Lieberman website issue? Lieberman's team claimed their website was under denial of service attack and while they had no evidence they believed it to be coming from Lamont supporters. It turns out Lieberman spent a whopping $15/month and had a 10GB limit on their website. It went over the limit and their site was shutdown since the limit was reached.

Apparently not the case. Breitbart is reporting that the Feds are in fact investigating a possible denial of service attack. Stats about the Lieberman website (and expenses) are listed in the report as well.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
faethor said:
There was the amusement of the Lieberman website issue? Lieberman's team claimed their website was under denial of service attack and while they had no evidence they believed it to be coming from Lamont supporters. It turns out Lieberman spent a whopping $15/month and had a 10GB limit on their website. It went over the limit and their site was shutdown since the limit was reached.

Apparently not the case. Breitbart is reporting that the Feds are in fact investigating a possible denial of service attack. Stats about the Lieberman website (and expenses) are listed in the report as well.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
cecilia said:
not to mention that VERY GAY KISS with bush. hmmmmmm. :?

Much as I think the pair of them are total erses, I don't think there's neccessarrily anything homosexual about that kiss.
I often kiss my close friends like that, male and female, doesn't matter.
It does convey closeness though.
 
cecilia said:
not to mention that VERY GAY KISS with bush. hmmmmmm. :?

Much as I think the pair of them are total erses, I don't think there's neccessarrily anything homosexual about that kiss.
I often kiss my close friends like that, male and female, doesn't matter.
It does convey closeness though.
 
cecilia said:
not to mention that VERY GAY KISS with bush. hmmmmmm. :?

Much as I think the pair of them are total erses, I don't think there's neccessarrily anything homosexual about that kiss.
I often kiss my close friends like that, male and female, doesn't matter.
It does convey closeness though.
 
cecilia said:
not to mention that VERY GAY KISS with bush. hmmmmmm. :?

Much as I think the pair of them are total erses, I don't think there's neccessarrily anything homosexual about that kiss.
I often kiss my close friends like that, male and female, doesn't matter.
It does convey closeness though.
 
cecilia said:
not to mention that VERY GAY KISS with bush. hmmmmmm. :?

Much as I think the pair of them are total erses, I don't think there's neccessarrily anything homosexual about that kiss.
I often kiss my close friends like that, male and female, doesn't matter.
It does convey closeness though.
 
cecilia said:
not to mention that VERY GAY KISS with bush. hmmmmmm. :?

Much as I think the pair of them are total erses, I don't think there's neccessarrily anything homosexual about that kiss.
I often kiss my close friends like that, male and female, doesn't matter.
It does convey closeness though.
 
Back
Top