Lieberman vs Lamont

[ltstanfo]

And so it begins....

Lieberman Files To Be An Independant Candidate in the November General Elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

I'm the first to admit that it is way too early to see anything conclusive but since everyone loves to use poll numbers:

Lieberman ahead by 5 points

The Rasmussen poll points out some interesting, if tentative data. I will be interested to follow this campaign through the November elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

And so it begins....

Lieberman Files To Be An Independant Candidate in the November General Elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

I'm the first to admit that it is way too early to see anything conclusive but since everyone loves to use poll numbers:

Lieberman ahead by 5 points

The Rasmussen poll points out some interesting, if tentative data. I will be interested to follow this campaign through the November elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

And so it begins....

Lieberman Files To Be An Independant Candidate in the November General Elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

I'm the first to admit that it is way too early to see anything conclusive but since everyone loves to use poll numbers:

Lieberman ahead by 5 points

The Rasmussen poll points out some interesting, if tentative data. I will be interested to follow this campaign through the November elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

And so it begins....

Lieberman Files To Be An Independant Candidate in the November General Elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

I'm the first to admit that it is way too early to see anything conclusive but since everyone loves to use poll numbers:

Lieberman ahead by 5 points

The Rasmussen poll points out some interesting, if tentative data. I will be interested to follow this campaign through the November elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[faethor]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

 

[faethor]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

 

[faethor]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

 

[faethor]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

 

[faethor]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

 

[faethor]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

I see your point and do not disagree. As I stated previously, it is too early for anything conclusive but it is interesting (to me).

What I am most interested to see is if the "protest vote" against Lieberman is real or was a majority in the Democrat party only.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

I see your point and do not disagree. As I stated previously, it is too early for anything conclusive but it is interesting (to me).

What I am most interested to see is if the "protest vote" against Lieberman is real or was a majority in the Democrat party only.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

I see your point and do not disagree. As I stated previously, it is too early for anything conclusive but it is interesting (to me).

What I am most interested to see is if the "protest vote" against Lieberman is real or was a majority in the Democrat party only.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

I see your point and do not disagree. As I stated previously, it is too early for anything conclusive but it is interesting (to me).

What I am most interested to see is if the "protest vote" against Lieberman is real or was a majority in the Democrat party only.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

I see your point and do not disagree. As I stated previously, it is too early for anything conclusive but it is interesting (to me).

What I am most interested to see is if the "protest vote" against Lieberman is real or was a majority in the Democrat party only.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Unforunately I couldn't find a polling error factor listed in the article. Perhaps it's in the sidebar but one has to register. It's important to know what % of error there is. Sure it was 40-40 and is now 46-41. But, is Lieberman really taking off of are they simply still within the factor of error for the poll.

For, example Bush is polling in the 33-36% range but Fox News is able to explain that if one includes all best factors of errors it's really 50%. Fox they're good humor.

I see your point and do not disagree. As I stated previously, it is too early for anything conclusive but it is interesting (to me).

What I am most interested to see is if the "protest vote" against Lieberman is real or was a majority in the Democrat party only.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

And so it begins....

Lieberman Files To Be An Independant Candidate in the November General Elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

I'm the first to admit that it is way too early to see anything conclusive but since everyone loves to use poll numbers:

Lieberman ahead by 5 points

The Rasmussen poll points out some interesting, if tentative data. I will be interested to follow this campaign through the November elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

And the polls continue...

Lieberman leads by double digits.

Again, it's too early for anything conclusive but I am curious to see how this turns out. Did the Democrats really do themselves a favor or will it ultimately backfire on them? Time will tell.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

And so it begins....

Lieberman Files To Be An Independant Candidate in the November General Elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

I'm the first to admit that it is way too early to see anything conclusive but since everyone loves to use poll numbers:

Lieberman ahead by 5 points

The Rasmussen poll points out some interesting, if tentative data. I will be interested to follow this campaign through the November elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

And the polls continue...

Lieberman leads by double digits.

Again, it's too early for anything conclusive but I am curious to see how this turns out. Did the Democrats really do themselves a favor or will it ultimately backfire on them? Time will tell.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

And so it begins....

Lieberman Files To Be An Independant Candidate in the November General Elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

I'm the first to admit that it is way too early to see anything conclusive but since everyone loves to use poll numbers:

Lieberman ahead by 5 points

The Rasmussen poll points out some interesting, if tentative data. I will be interested to follow this campaign through the November elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

And the polls continue...

Lieberman leads by double digits.

Again, it's too early for anything conclusive but I am curious to see how this turns out. Did the Democrats really do themselves a favor or will it ultimately backfire on them? Time will tell.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

And so it begins....

Lieberman Files To Be An Independant Candidate in the November General Elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

I'm the first to admit that it is way too early to see anything conclusive but since everyone loves to use poll numbers:

Lieberman ahead by 5 points

The Rasmussen poll points out some interesting, if tentative data. I will be interested to follow this campaign through the November elections.

Regards,
Ltstanfo

And the polls continue...

Lieberman leads by double digits.

Again, it's too early for anything conclusive but I am curious to see how this turns out. Did the Democrats really do themselves a favor or will it ultimately backfire on them? Time will tell.

Regards,
Ltstanfo