Palin's Affair

[redrumloa]

IF she did, that would be sad. However I don't see you mentioning dirty hush money or Palin's husband dying or such.

 

[redrumloa]

IF she did, that would be sad. However I don't see you mentioning dirty hush money or Palin's husband dying or such.

 

[redrumloa]

IF she did, that would be sad. However I don't see you mentioning dirty hush money or Palin's husband dying or such.

 

[redrumloa]

IF she did, that would be sad. However I don't see you mentioning dirty hush money or Palin's husband dying or such.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

IF she did, that would be sad. However I don't see you mentioning dirty hush money or Palin's husband dying or such.

Is that where the moral goastposts are? Having an affair, sad. Giving your lover money - just wrong wrong wrong!

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

IF she did, that would be sad. However I don't see you mentioning dirty hush money or Palin's husband dying or such.

Is that where the moral goastposts are? Having an affair, sad. Giving your lover money - just wrong wrong wrong!

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

IF she did, that would be sad. However I don't see you mentioning dirty hush money or Palin's husband dying or such.

Is that where the moral goastposts are? Having an affair, sad. Giving your lover money - just wrong wrong wrong!

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

IF she did, that would be sad. However I don't see you mentioning dirty hush money or Palin's husband dying or such.

Is that where the moral goastposts are? Having an affair, sad. Giving your lover money - just wrong wrong wrong!

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

IF she did, that would be sad. However I don't see you mentioning dirty hush money or Palin's husband dying or such.

Is that where the moral goastposts are? Having an affair, sad. Giving your lover money - just wrong wrong wrong!

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

IF she did, that would be sad. However I don't see you mentioning dirty hush money or Palin's husband dying or such.

Is that where the moral goastposts are? Having an affair, sad. Giving your lover money - just wrong wrong wrong!

 

[metalman]

Now the National Enquirer is publishing that Palin had an affair with a business partner. This affair was the reason that the business failed. Palin's husband forced a pull out of the business.

Question is ... will the media make the same mistake and fail to republish tabloid news? If they don't will those who believed it was liberal media hiding something now believe it is conservative media hiding something? Or will they realize the problem here is that National Enquirer is a tabolid and has 0 journalistic credibility.

The Enquirer established some credibility with the confirmation of the Edwards story but they're now back at 0 credibility. The Palin story has already been debunked. The press smears of Palin are just increasing her popularity now.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin. You’ve got the Soros cash, the Larry Flynt pervert brigade, the left wing Daily Kooks, and the democrat shills in the media lead by the the Associated Press. The media have now unwittingly immunized Palin by throwing out so much trash already, that has been so quickly proven untrue and exposed their agenda. So now, everyone knows the media is out to get her. The media has impeached their credibility. Palin's favorability numbers are increasing dramatically, an example of unintended consequences.

 

[metalman]

Now the National Enquirer is publishing that Palin had an affair with a business partner. This affair was the reason that the business failed. Palin's husband forced a pull out of the business.

Question is ... will the media make the same mistake and fail to republish tabloid news? If they don't will those who believed it was liberal media hiding something now believe it is conservative media hiding something? Or will they realize the problem here is that National Enquirer is a tabolid and has 0 journalistic credibility.

The Enquirer established some credibility with the confirmation of the Edwards story but they're now back at 0 credibility. The Palin story has already been debunked. The press smears of Palin are just increasing her popularity now.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin. You’ve got the Soros cash, the Larry Flynt pervert brigade, the left wing Daily Kooks, and the democrat shills in the media lead by the the Associated Press. The media have now unwittingly immunized Palin by throwing out so much trash already, that has been so quickly proven untrue and exposed their agenda. So now, everyone knows the media is out to get her. The media has impeached their credibility. Palin's favorability numbers are increasing dramatically, an example of unintended consequences.

 

[metalman]

Now the National Enquirer is publishing that Palin had an affair with a business partner. This affair was the reason that the business failed. Palin's husband forced a pull out of the business.

Question is ... will the media make the same mistake and fail to republish tabloid news? If they don't will those who believed it was liberal media hiding something now believe it is conservative media hiding something? Or will they realize the problem here is that National Enquirer is a tabolid and has 0 journalistic credibility.

The Enquirer established some credibility with the confirmation of the Edwards story but they're now back at 0 credibility. The Palin story has already been debunked. The press smears of Palin are just increasing her popularity now.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin. You’ve got the Soros cash, the Larry Flynt pervert brigade, the left wing Daily Kooks, and the democrat shills in the media lead by the the Associated Press. The media have now unwittingly immunized Palin by throwing out so much trash already, that has been so quickly proven untrue and exposed their agenda. So now, everyone knows the media is out to get her. The media has impeached their credibility. Palin's favorability numbers are increasing dramatically, an example of unintended consequences.

 

[metalman]

Now the National Enquirer is publishing that Palin had an affair with a business partner. This affair was the reason that the business failed. Palin's husband forced a pull out of the business.

Question is ... will the media make the same mistake and fail to republish tabloid news? If they don't will those who believed it was liberal media hiding something now believe it is conservative media hiding something? Or will they realize the problem here is that National Enquirer is a tabolid and has 0 journalistic credibility.

The Enquirer established some credibility with the confirmation of the Edwards story but they're now back at 0 credibility. The Palin story has already been debunked. The press smears of Palin are just increasing her popularity now.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin. You’ve got the Soros cash, the Larry Flynt pervert brigade, the left wing Daily Kooks, and the democrat shills in the media lead by the the Associated Press. The media have now unwittingly immunized Palin by throwing out so much trash already, that has been so quickly proven untrue and exposed their agenda. So now, everyone knows the media is out to get her. The media has impeached their credibility. Palin's favorability numbers are increasing dramatically, an example of unintended consequences.

 

[metalman]

Now the National Enquirer is publishing that Palin had an affair with a business partner. This affair was the reason that the business failed. Palin's husband forced a pull out of the business.

Question is ... will the media make the same mistake and fail to republish tabloid news? If they don't will those who believed it was liberal media hiding something now believe it is conservative media hiding something? Or will they realize the problem here is that National Enquirer is a tabolid and has 0 journalistic credibility.

The Enquirer established some credibility with the confirmation of the Edwards story but they're now back at 0 credibility. The Palin story has already been debunked. The press smears of Palin are just increasing her popularity now.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin. You’ve got the Soros cash, the Larry Flynt pervert brigade, the left wing Daily Kooks, and the democrat shills in the media lead by the the Associated Press. The media have now unwittingly immunized Palin by throwing out so much trash already, that has been so quickly proven untrue and exposed their agenda. So now, everyone knows the media is out to get her. The media has impeached their credibility. Palin's favorability numbers are increasing dramatically, an example of unintended consequences.

 

[metalman]

Now the National Enquirer is publishing that Palin had an affair with a business partner. This affair was the reason that the business failed. Palin's husband forced a pull out of the business.

Question is ... will the media make the same mistake and fail to republish tabloid news? If they don't will those who believed it was liberal media hiding something now believe it is conservative media hiding something? Or will they realize the problem here is that National Enquirer is a tabolid and has 0 journalistic credibility.

The Enquirer established some credibility with the confirmation of the Edwards story but they're now back at 0 credibility. The Palin story has already been debunked. The press smears of Palin are just increasing her popularity now.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin. You’ve got the Soros cash, the Larry Flynt pervert brigade, the left wing Daily Kooks, and the democrat shills in the media lead by the the Associated Press. The media have now unwittingly immunized Palin by throwing out so much trash already, that has been so quickly proven untrue and exposed their agenda. So now, everyone knows the media is out to get her. The media has impeached their credibility. Palin's favorability numbers are increasing dramatically, an example of unintended consequences.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

The Enquirer established some credibility with the confirmation of the Edwards story but they're now back at 0 credibility.

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

The Palin story has already been debunked. The press smears of Palin are just increasing her popularity now.

Can I get an AMEN brother and pass the Cool-Aid.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin.

Naw. It was the Republicans who put up a pre-destroyed candidate. Maybe they figured that if she was from "Middle-of-Nowheresville" none of her stories would follow her.
Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

The Enquirer established some credibility with the confirmation of the Edwards story but they're now back at 0 credibility.

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

The Palin story has already been debunked. The press smears of Palin are just increasing her popularity now.

Can I get an AMEN brother and pass the Cool-Aid.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin.

Naw. It was the Republicans who put up a pre-destroyed candidate. Maybe they figured that if she was from "Middle-of-Nowheresville" none of her stories would follow her.
Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

The Enquirer established some credibility with the confirmation of the Edwards story but they're now back at 0 credibility.

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

The Palin story has already been debunked. The press smears of Palin are just increasing her popularity now.

Can I get an AMEN brother and pass the Cool-Aid.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin.

Naw. It was the Republicans who put up a pre-destroyed candidate. Maybe they figured that if she was from "Middle-of-Nowheresville" none of her stories would follow her.
Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

The Enquirer established some credibility with the confirmation of the Edwards story but they're now back at 0 credibility.

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

The Palin story has already been debunked. The press smears of Palin are just increasing her popularity now.

Can I get an AMEN brother and pass the Cool-Aid.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin.

Naw. It was the Republicans who put up a pre-destroyed candidate. Maybe they figured that if she was from "Middle-of-Nowheresville" none of her stories would follow her.
Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.