Palin's Affair

[faethor]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin.

While the DemocratIC party has large resources it's conspirarcy that they're focusing this $$ on destroying Palin unless you can provide some hard evidence that they are somehow shipping $$ to such slander.

Naw. It was the Republicans who put up a pre-destroyed candidate.

I agree. Your link to You Tube shows the Republicans themselves realize this. Also, their actions show this. What they've done is decryed the press as anti-Palin and she's yet to be interviewed by anyone. Those evil Democratic Partiers are doing things like allowing Obama to talk to religious crowd that's anti his positions and going on Bill O'Reilly.

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

 

[faethor]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin.

While the DemocratIC party has large resources it's conspirarcy that they're focusing this $$ on destroying Palin unless you can provide some hard evidence that they are somehow shipping $$ to such slander.

Naw. It was the Republicans who put up a pre-destroyed candidate.

I agree. Your link to You Tube shows the Republicans themselves realize this. Also, their actions show this. What they've done is decryed the press as anti-Palin and she's yet to be interviewed by anyone. Those evil Democratic Partiers are doing things like allowing Obama to talk to religious crowd that's anti his positions and going on Bill O'Reilly.

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

 

[faethor]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin.

While the DemocratIC party has large resources it's conspirarcy that they're focusing this $$ on destroying Palin unless you can provide some hard evidence that they are somehow shipping $$ to such slander.

Naw. It was the Republicans who put up a pre-destroyed candidate.

I agree. Your link to You Tube shows the Republicans themselves realize this. Also, their actions show this. What they've done is decryed the press as anti-Palin and she's yet to be interviewed by anyone. Those evil Democratic Partiers are doing things like allowing Obama to talk to religious crowd that's anti his positions and going on Bill O'Reilly.

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

 

[faethor]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin.

While the DemocratIC party has large resources it's conspirarcy that they're focusing this $$ on destroying Palin unless you can provide some hard evidence that they are somehow shipping $$ to such slander.

Naw. It was the Republicans who put up a pre-destroyed candidate.

I agree. Your link to You Tube shows the Republicans themselves realize this. Also, their actions show this. What they've done is decryed the press as anti-Palin and she's yet to be interviewed by anyone. Those evil Democratic Partiers are doing things like allowing Obama to talk to religious crowd that's anti his positions and going on Bill O'Reilly.

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

 

[faethor]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin.

While the DemocratIC party has large resources it's conspirarcy that they're focusing this $$ on destroying Palin unless you can provide some hard evidence that they are somehow shipping $$ to such slander.

Naw. It was the Republicans who put up a pre-destroyed candidate.

I agree. Your link to You Tube shows the Republicans themselves realize this. Also, their actions show this. What they've done is decryed the press as anti-Palin and she's yet to be interviewed by anyone. Those evil Democratic Partiers are doing things like allowing Obama to talk to religious crowd that's anti his positions and going on Bill O'Reilly.

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

 

[faethor]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Think of the massive resources that the democrat party has directed to destroying Palin.

While the DemocratIC party has large resources it's conspirarcy that they're focusing this $$ on destroying Palin unless you can provide some hard evidence that they are somehow shipping $$ to such slander.

Naw. It was the Republicans who put up a pre-destroyed candidate.

I agree. Your link to You Tube shows the Republicans themselves realize this. Also, their actions show this. What they've done is decryed the press as anti-Palin and she's yet to be interviewed by anyone. Those evil Democratic Partiers are doing things like allowing Obama to talk to religious crowd that's anti his positions and going on Bill O'Reilly.

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

Team McCain is involved in shutting down Alaska's investigation of Palin.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

Team McCain is involved in shutting down Alaska's investigation of Palin.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

Team McCain is involved in shutting down Alaska's investigation of Palin.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

Team McCain is involved in shutting down Alaska's investigation of Palin.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

Team McCain is involved in shutting down Alaska's investigation of Palin.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Personally I think she's a driven, ambitious, amoral woman who BSed McCain (who likes the dames, for sure) into jumping the gun and announcing her so she could count on the GOP machine to start shutting down those investigations in progress. She is smart, slippery, sociopathic and VPILF.

McCain had 1 15 minute conservation with her before the selection. IMO (yes conspirarcy) I'd bet that the religious right wingers made some sort of deal with McCain that they were allowed to influence his VP selection. She's fresh from their beds afterall.

Team McCain is involved in shutting down Alaska's investigation of Palin.

 

[metalman]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Credible -- story is confirmed by facts.

Not Credible -- printing a lot of speculative innuendo, all while maintaining a malign indifference as to whether or not said speculative innuendo is anything other than a smear campaign.

The Edwards affair/ love child is confirmed fact. It's also a fact the media buried the story for months despite their knowledge of confirming facts because Edwards has a "( Dem)" after his name.

68% of voters believe that "most reporters try to help the candidate they want to win." And 49% of those surveyed believe reporters are backing Barack Obama, while just 14% think the media is in the tank for Sen. McCain.

Meanwhile, 51% of those surveyed thought the press was "trying to hurt" Mrs. Palin with its coverage.

 

[metalman]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Credible -- story is confirmed by facts.

Not Credible -- printing a lot of speculative innuendo, all while maintaining a malign indifference as to whether or not said speculative innuendo is anything other than a smear campaign.

The Edwards affair/ love child is confirmed fact. It's also a fact the media buried the story for months despite their knowledge of confirming facts because Edwards has a "( Dem)" after his name.

68% of voters believe that "most reporters try to help the candidate they want to win." And 49% of those surveyed believe reporters are backing Barack Obama, while just 14% think the media is in the tank for Sen. McCain.

Meanwhile, 51% of those surveyed thought the press was "trying to hurt" Mrs. Palin with its coverage.

 

[metalman]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Credible -- story is confirmed by facts.

Not Credible -- printing a lot of speculative innuendo, all while maintaining a malign indifference as to whether or not said speculative innuendo is anything other than a smear campaign.

The Edwards affair/ love child is confirmed fact. It's also a fact the media buried the story for months despite their knowledge of confirming facts because Edwards has a "( Dem)" after his name.

68% of voters believe that "most reporters try to help the candidate they want to win." And 49% of those surveyed believe reporters are backing Barack Obama, while just 14% think the media is in the tank for Sen. McCain.

Meanwhile, 51% of those surveyed thought the press was "trying to hurt" Mrs. Palin with its coverage.

 

[metalman]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Credible -- story is confirmed by facts.

Not Credible -- printing a lot of speculative innuendo, all while maintaining a malign indifference as to whether or not said speculative innuendo is anything other than a smear campaign.

The Edwards affair/ love child is confirmed fact. It's also a fact the media buried the story for months despite their knowledge of confirming facts because Edwards has a "( Dem)" after his name.

68% of voters believe that "most reporters try to help the candidate they want to win." And 49% of those surveyed believe reporters are backing Barack Obama, while just 14% think the media is in the tank for Sen. McCain.

Meanwhile, 51% of those surveyed thought the press was "trying to hurt" Mrs. Palin with its coverage.

 

[metalman]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Credible -- story is confirmed by facts.

Not Credible -- printing a lot of speculative innuendo, all while maintaining a malign indifference as to whether or not said speculative innuendo is anything other than a smear campaign.

The Edwards affair/ love child is confirmed fact. It's also a fact the media buried the story for months despite their knowledge of confirming facts because Edwards has a "( Dem)" after his name.

68% of voters believe that "most reporters try to help the candidate they want to win." And 49% of those surveyed believe reporters are backing Barack Obama, while just 14% think the media is in the tank for Sen. McCain.

Meanwhile, 51% of those surveyed thought the press was "trying to hurt" Mrs. Palin with its coverage.

 

[metalman]

Bashes Dems - Credible : bashes Repubs - not credible.
I see the equation.

You definitely have a good point here.

When the National Enquirer posted news about John Edwards affair we saw various people decry the rest of the USA media as liberal and that's why they ignored the NE articles. (Of course many clearly conservatives came to his aid and the conservative press ignored it too, but that's beside the point.)

Now when the National Enquirer posts news about Palin's affair we see similiar, frequently the same, people decrying the reasoning this as a liberal smear campaign. Many news sources are ignoring the NE articles again but now somehow they are still liberal.

Not quite a double standard I guess. Simply declare liberal media and hope it sticks. Typical Republican Rovian tactics of the last decade.

Credible -- story is confirmed by facts.

Not Credible -- printing a lot of speculative innuendo, all while maintaining a malign indifference as to whether or not said speculative innuendo is anything other than a smear campaign.

The Edwards affair/ love child is confirmed fact. It's also a fact the media buried the story for months despite their knowledge of confirming facts because Edwards has a "( Dem)" after his name.

68% of voters believe that "most reporters try to help the candidate they want to win." And 49% of those surveyed believe reporters are backing Barack Obama, while just 14% think the media is in the tank for Sen. McCain.

Meanwhile, 51% of those surveyed thought the press was "trying to hurt" Mrs. Palin with its coverage.

 

[metalman]

USA TODAY/Gallup Poll: McCain now leads Democrat Barack Obama by 50%-46% among registered voters, the Republican's biggest advantage since January and a turnaround from the USA TODAY poll taken just before the convention opened in St. Paul. Then, he lagged by 7 percentage points.

"The Republicans had a very successful convention and the selection of Sarah Palin has made a big difference,"

 

[metalman]

USA TODAY/Gallup Poll: McCain now leads Democrat Barack Obama by 50%-46% among registered voters, the Republican's biggest advantage since January and a turnaround from the USA TODAY poll taken just before the convention opened in St. Paul. Then, he lagged by 7 percentage points.

"The Republicans had a very successful convention and the selection of Sarah Palin has made a big difference,"