Sex as a political weapon?

[redrumloa]

The View Host: Due Process Wasn’t Needed to Call Justice Kavanaugh a Rapist: “A Woman’s Word Was Enough”

[W]e finally said a woman’s word is enough. I’ve taken many cases to trial with just a woman’s word. [ Applause ] And now you have the First Lady of the United States telling women everywhere your word is not enough. I think it does so much damage, and quite frankly, that isn’t the law.

 

[redrumloa]

Majority U.S. Women: Democrats Used Kavanaugh Sexual Assault Accusations for Political Gain

Despite the establishment media and Hollywood’s “Believe Women” campaign, the vast majority of American voters — including 84 percent of women and 85 percent of men — say when it comes to sexual harassment allegations, the standards of the legal due process should be applied. Only 15 percent of voters say the legal due process should be “relaxed.”

Democrats want to lose the midterms. Either that, or they are incompetent beyond belief.

 

[the_leander]

Tim Pool covers the fallout of the Kavanaugh case here. Gotta say, it is not a good look and it absolutely makes a mockery of the Dem's so called desire to see women protected against sexual assault.

 

[redrumloa]

Another Kavanaugh accuser admits to fabricating rape story

One of Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s accusers admitted this week that she made up her lurid tale of a backseat car rape, saying it “was a tactic” to try to derail the judge’s confirmation to the Supreme Court.

Sen. Charles E. Grassley, chairman of the Judiciary Committee revealed the fraud in a letter to the FBI and Justice Department Friday, asking them to prosecute Judy Munro-Leighton for lying to and obstructing Congress.

Mr. Grassley said Ms. Munro-Leighton is a left-wing activist who hijacked another “Jane Doe” anonymous report about a backseat rape and claimed it as her own story, calling it a “vicious assault.”

“I am Jane Doe from Oceanside CA — Kavanaugh raped me,” Ms. Munro-Leighton wrote in an Oct. 3 email claiming to have been a victim of the judge.

 

[redrumloa]

Sex as a career weapon too. The TLDR is that last year this broad first defended a man accused of rape and attacked the accuser, because he was someone she worked for on a popular show. Then when he is FULLY acquitted and she is apparently still looking for career opportunities, she flip-flops and accuses the exact same man to be a rapist while pretending to be a BFF with the female hoaxer.

Lena Dunham Throws Another Innocent Man Under the Rape Bus

Here are the facts:

The prosecutor not only declined to charge Miller based on the statute of limitations, they added that “based on the evidence presented, which included Victim, Suspect and witness statements, there are inconsistencies which cannot be overcome. For those reasons, the People would not be able to prove this crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and prosecution is declined.”

Cut and dried. When a PROSECUTOR declines to press charges, it is fair to say the crime probably never happened. But look how this broad handles the before and the after.

And the fact that Miller was a writer and executive producer of Lena Dunham’s HBO show Girls does not change that fact.

Nevertheless, on two occasions related to this allegation, the morally illiterate Dunham has gotten it exactly wrong.

When Perrineau first made her allegation against Murray public in November of last year, and without knowing any of the facts, Dunham ran out to defend her pal by releasing a statement that called Perrineau a liar.

“While our first instinct is to listen to every woman’s story, our insider knowledge of Murray’s situation makes us confident that sadly this accusation is one of the 3% of assault cases that are misreported every year,” Dunham said.

The backlash against Dunham was brutal, immediate, and deserved. The only “insider information” she could have possibly had that would prove a rape did not happen is if she had strapped Miller with a body-cam throughout all of 2012 and saved the tapes.

Dunham’s statement was as cruel as it was arrogant. From on high, she abused her Hollywood power to proclaim a pal’s innocence and wrist-flicked a young woman who might have been the victim of a rape.

So first she defends the guy, only because she worked for him. Fast forward a year and apparently due to lack of work, she flip-flops in the hopes of new opportunities the #metoo movement provides.

There is nothing wrong with an apology, but nowhere in this apology does Dunham bother to mention that Murray was cleared. In fact, Dunham’s writing suggests he is guilty as hell.

While Dunham admits she flat-out lied in her statement defending Murray, she then goes out of her way to attack Miller’s credibility: “I didn’t have the ‘insider information’ I claimed but rather blind faith in a story that kept slipping and changing and revealed itself to mean nothing at all.”

She adds, “I believe you, Aurora.”

But this is who the monstrous Dunham is, and this is not the first innocent man she has publicly tarred as a rapist to boost her profile. Remember Barry One?

And shame on the far-left Hollywood Reporter for publishing Dunham’s self-regarding apology without at least including an editor’s note about Murray being cleared.

Lena is not very bright. She's too stupid and sloppy in her faux feminism and overt greed, she won't get anywhere on the #metoo gravy train. This is where we have gone though. Human filth like Lena are not isolated people.