- Joined
- Nov 16, 2011
- Messages
- 3,692
- Reaction score
- 863
[COLOR=rgba(109, 57, 140, 0.74902)]Court Requires Disabled Rape Victim To Prove She Resisted, Calls For Evidence Of ‘Biting, Kicking, Scratching’http://thinkprogress.org/justice/20...ls-for-evidence-of-biting-kicking-scratching/[/COLOR]
In a 4-3 ruling Tuesday afternoon, the Connecticut State Supreme Court overturned the sexual assault conviction of a man who had sex with a woman who “has severe cerebral palsy, has the intellectual functional equivalent of a 3-year-old and cannot verbally communicate.” The Court held that, because Connecticut statutes define physical incapacity for the purpose of sexual assault as “unconscious or for any other reason. . . physically unable to communicate unwillingness to an act,” the defendant could not be convicted if there was any chance that the victim could have communicated her lack of consent. Since the victim in this case was capable of “biting, kicking, scratching, screeching, groaning or gesturing,” the Court ruled that that victim could have communicated lack of consent despite her serious mental deficiencies:
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/20...ls-for-evidence-of-biting-kicking-scratching/
one for each of those ass clowns... how repulsive!! those are the "brilliant minds" dispensing "justice "; people, we should all be worried...
In a 4-3 ruling Tuesday afternoon, the Connecticut State Supreme Court overturned the sexual assault conviction of a man who had sex with a woman who “has severe cerebral palsy, has the intellectual functional equivalent of a 3-year-old and cannot verbally communicate.” The Court held that, because Connecticut statutes define physical incapacity for the purpose of sexual assault as “unconscious or for any other reason. . . physically unable to communicate unwillingness to an act,” the defendant could not be convicted if there was any chance that the victim could have communicated her lack of consent. Since the victim in this case was capable of “biting, kicking, scratching, screeching, groaning or gesturing,” the Court ruled that that victim could have communicated lack of consent despite her serious mental deficiencies:
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/20...ls-for-evidence-of-biting-kicking-scratching/
one for each of those ass clowns... how repulsive!! those are the "brilliant minds" dispensing "justice "; people, we should all be worried...