The USA is now the USSA, thanks to crooked Democrats!

Acting FBI Director Is Under Investigation For Democrat Campaign Activities

It is one thing, of course, to be a political operative and fundraiser and brand new to federal employment and violate the Hatch Act, it is quite another to be a career federal employee and second in command of an agency that is labeled “further restricted” and to blatantly violate the law. (This pamphlet gives the rules, note that the FBI employees are “further restricted” employees.) And that brings us to our subject, deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe.

McCabe has been in the limelight recently because he is now the acting FBI director until a new director is confirmed. He was also active in the Hillary Clinton email investigation. His other claim to fame is that his wife is prominent in Virginia Democrat politics (to the extent that Northern Virginia Democrats can be said to Virginian). She ran, unsuccessfully, for a state senate seat. She received some $700K from the Clinton organization via Clinton bag man and Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe.

Being the spouse of a political candidate presents a host of challenges for a federal employee, particularly one in a “further restricted” agency. And McCabe did not meet them well.

The Office of U.S. Special Counsel, the government’s main whistleblower agency, is investigating whether FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s activities supporting his wife Jill’s Democratic campaign for Virginia state senate in 2015 violated the Hatch Act’s prohibition against FBI agents campaigning in partisan races.

The agency’s probe was prompted by a complaint in April from a former FBI agent who forwarded social media photos showing McCabe wearing a T-shirt supporting his wife’s campaign during a public event and then posting a photo on social media urging voters to join him in voting for his wife.

He actively supported his wife’s very partisan candidacy:

mccabe1.jpg
 
So... I thought commies were supposedly charitable and caring?!? LMAO!! Yeah, right......

Bernie Sanders’ Wife Tried to Have Disabled Residents Kicked Out of Group Home

But Judicial Watch now reports that the parcel of land that Jane Sanders eyed for the college’s expansion included a group home for disabled people. Part of the deal was that she negotiate the transfer of the residents before the college took the property.

However, the watchdog reports that she tried to kick them out of their home instead. The report cites a letter to the group’s attorney in which she says, “It is simply not fair to expect the College to continue to carry the burden of the expenses associated with housing both your population and ours until February 2012.”

Judicial Watch claims that the letter is a sign not only of “Jane’s heartlessness, but also her incompetence as the college president for not ensuring the negotiated transfer of those disabled people before the school took over the property.”

The group was eventually moved out after being served eviction papers by the Catholic Diocese of Burlington.
 
CNN caught blackmailing a shitposter, who posted the CNN meme Trump tweeted.

19657049_1755751374450224_4547078433607446130_n.png
 
Legal Analysis
Assange Accuses CNN of Committing Crime With Trump Wrestling Story (He Might Be Right)

https://twitter.com/x/status/882430554544713728
https://twitter.com/x/status/882474312296542208
Now, Assange could just be having some fun at CNN’s expense for beating the GIF story further into the ground—and putting themselves at the center of it, but the truth is, he has a point. Andrew Kaczynski, the author of the article, is based in New York (as per his Twitter profile), so the NY statute could apply, assuming that’s where he and CNN published the article. Taking a look at the elements of the statute itself, New York Penal Law § 135.60 says that a person is guilty of coercion in the second degree if he:

compels or induces a person to … abstain from engaging in conduct in which he or she has a legal right to engage … by means of instilling in him or her a fear that, if the demand is not complied with, the actor or another will … Expose a secret or publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject some person to hatred, contempt or ridicule​

CNN is saying that they will reveal the user’s private identity, currently kept anonymous in his Reddit posts, if he doesn’t stop to post offensive material (which he is legally allowed to do). That sure sounds like it fits the bill.
 
If there were Vegas odds on this, I'd bet this is retribution for his political views. Either way, it is a completely heartless dick move by the evil far left leaning Disney.

I was fired! Puppeteer who voiced Kermit for decades claims he didn't quit and was SACKED by Disney over the phone
  • Steve Whitmire, 57, who voiced the Muppets' character since 1990, has been replaced by another performer, Matt Vogel
  • Today he revealed that he was fired by Disney execs over the phone in October
  • He did not reveal why aside from saying that bosses had raised two 'issues' during the call that had never been discussed previously
  • Whitmire said he was crushed by the move as The Muppets were his 'life's work'
  • Kermit was the original Muppet created by American puppeteer Jim Henson, first appearing in 1955
  • Whitmire began permanently voicing Kermit after Henson died in 1990, although he had been involved with the Muppets since at least 1978
Who is Disney again? Let me remind you.



The dark side of Disney
For example, animator Art Babbitt, who admittedly loathed Disney, claimed that Disney and his lawyer, Gunther Lessing, attended meetings of the German American Bund, a pro-Nazi organisation, in the late 1930s.

In 1939, Walt Disney welcomed German film-maker and Nazi propagandist Leni Riefenstahl to Hollywood to promote her film, Olympia. He had invited her before Kristallnacht, in November 1938, but didn’t bother to withdraw the invitation once it became clear what was happening in Nazi Germany. Or again, another animator, David Swift, who was Jewish, told a biographer that when in 1938, he informed Disney that he was leaving to take a job at Columbia Pictures, Disney responded — in a feigned Yiddish accent — “Okay, Davy boy, off you go to work for those Jews. It’s where you belong, with those Jews.” Charming.
 
USPS Acknowledges It Broke Federal Law By Letting Workers Campaign For Clinton

800-x-419-Canvas-259-759x419.png


According to an Office of Special Counsel (OSC) report obtained by Fox News, the United States Postal Service broke federal law by letting workers do union-funded work for the Clinton campaign as well as other Democratic candidates, while the employees were on leave.

According to the OSC’s report, USPS “engaged in systemic violations” of the Hatch Act, a federal law which limits political activity of federal employees.

The OSC, which monitors compliance with the Hatch Act as well as other laws, says the law is designed to ensure that federal programs are “administered in a non-partisan fashion, to protect federal employees from political coercion in the workplace, and to ensure that federal employees are advanced based on merit and not based on political affiliation.”

Although employees are able to do some political work while they’re on leave, the OSC report determined that the USPS showed a “bias” in the union’s 2016 campaign effort.
 
redrumloa said:
Google fires Conservative employee for being Conservative.

"I Have A Right To Express My Concerns": Fired Google Engineer Will Pursue Legal Action; Assange Offers Job

https://twitter.com/x/status/894834730461483008
https://twitter.com/x/status/894914602026373121
James Damore: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Click to expand...

Four Actual Psychologists Respond To Anti-PC Memo That Got Google Employee Fired

https://twitter.com/x/status/894252488806862852
Dr. Lee Jessim also thinks Damore is right:

The author of the Google essay on issues related to diversity gets nearly all of the science and its implications exactly right.

The evolutionary psychology research on sex differences is one of the best reasons to promote sexual diversity in the workplace – and one of the best reasons to expect that there may still be some inequalities of outcome in particular jobs, companies, and industries.

Dr. Soh, a woman, doesn’t find the Google memo sexist at all:

As a woman who’s worked in academia and within STEM, I didn’t find the memo offensive or sexist in the least. I found it to be a well thought out document, asking for greater tolerance for differences in opinion, and treating people as individuals instead of based on group membership.

Within the field of neuroscience, sex differences between women and men—when it comes to brain structure and function and associated differences in personality and occupational preferences—are understood to be true, because the evidence for them (thousands of studies) is strong. This is not information that’s considered controversial or up for debate; if you tried to argue otherwise, or for purely social influences, you’d be laughed at.

No matter how controversial it is or how great the pushback, I believe it’s important to speak out, because if we can’t discuss scientific truths, where does that leave us?

Professor Geoffrey Miller would have given the manifesto an A- had it been submitted to him in a masters level course:

For what it’s worth, I think that almost all of the Google memo’s empirical claims are scientifically accurate. Moreover, they are stated quite carefully and dispassionately. Its key claims about sex differences are especially well-supported by large volumes of research across species, cultures, and history. I know a little about sex differences research. On the topic of evolution and human sexuality, I’ve taught for 28 years, written 4 books and over 100 academic publications, given 190 talks, reviewed papers for over 50 journals, and mentored 11 Ph.D. students. Whoever the memo’s author is, he has obviously read a fair amount about these topics. Graded fairly, his memo would get at least an A- in any masters’ level psychology course. It is consistent with the scientific state of the art on sex differences. (Blank slate gender feminism is advocacy rather than science: no gender feminist I’ve met has ever been able to give a coherent answer to the question ‘What empirical findings would convince you that psychological sex differences evolved?’)
 
Google Is Not What It Seems
by Julian Assange

In this extract from his new book When Google Met Wikileaks, WikiLeaks' publisher Julian Assange describes the special relationship between Google, Hillary Clinton and the State Department -- and what that means for the future of the internet.

Pretty long but, an essential read. A read that I doubt anyone on this site will disagree with, and that is really saying something.
 
Last edited:
redrumloa said:
Google Is Not What It Seems
by Julian Assange

In this extract from his new book When Google Met Wikileaks, WikiLeaks' publisher Julian Assange describes the special relationship between Google, Hillary Clinton and the State Department -- and what that means for the future of the internet.

Pretty long but, an essential read. A read that I doubt anyone on this site will disagree with, and that is really saying something.
Click to expand...

 
Since we don't have a Female Privilege thread, I will drop here.

Judge Tells Woman Burglar: ‘If You Were a Man You’d Be Going to Prison’

The court heard that Ms. Remmer, a 23-year-old mother of one, had numerous previous convictions for theft and shoplifting. Her defence argued that she had turned to drugs after developing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and claimed she “deeply remorseful”.

The recorder judge, Mark Lowe, QC, handed her a suspended sentence of 18 months, and she was ordered to complete a 30-day rehabilitation programme.

Recorder Lowe said: “The gravity is that if you were a man you would be going to prison today."
 
How many here remember the name Ray Nagin? Besides metalman, pobably no one. However, during the New Orleans aftermath to Hurricane Katrina, he was a Liberal Media darling. He was plastered over every channel with near 24/7 coverage, because he kept blasting then President Bush. He was such a Liberal Media darling that most the left wing talking heads at the time were saying he should be the next Democrat candidate for president. Oh my, how things change. He's not mentioned on TV at all, and the reporting being done on him are back page blurbs online.

Ex-New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin sentenced to 10 years

Former mayor Ray Nagin, the businessman-turned-politician who became the worldwide face of the city after Hurricane Katrina, was sentenced to 10 years in prison Wednesday.

Nagin, 58, was ordered to report to federal prison Sept. 8 and to pay restitution of $82,000. He was found guilty Feb. 12 of fraud, bribery and related charges involving crimes that took place before and after Katrina devastated the city in August 2005.

Prosecutors immediately objected to the sentence, which falls well below typical guidelines that called for 15-20 years.

"What Ray Nagin did was sell his office over and over and over again," Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Coman said outside the courthouse. "The damage that Ray Nagin inflicted upon this community ... is incalculable. We as a community need not and should not accept public corruption."

ruh roh...

Before announcing the sentence, Berrigan indicated she would "downwardly depart from guidelines" and that "sentencing imposed should reflect Nagin's ability to harm the public again."

Yeah and then there is that. He only got 10 years instead of 15-20, because he is a Democrat.

A jury convicted Nagin of accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes — money, free vacation trips and truckloads of free granite for his family business — from businessmen who wanted work from the city or Nagin's support for various hurricane recovery projects.

Prosecutors asked the court to send Nagin to prison for a long time. They argued that he was found guilty of 20 of 21 counts in the indictment, and that he participated in and orchestrated a years-long conspiracy to enrich himself and his family.

The government also argued that Nagin spent years covering up his crimes and that his testimony during the two-week trial showed an unwillingness to accept responsibility for his actions.

Gee, sounds an awful lot like the Clinton Foundation in Haiti, doesn't it?

Coman compared Nagin's crimes with those of other public officials who drew stiff sentences, including former Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick (28 years), former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich (14 years) and former Birmingham, Ala., mayor Larry Langford (15 years).

Gee, what do these 4 men have in common? Right, all Democrat.
 
Last edited:
You've heard of the Big Lie, right? It remains firmly in the Dem playbook to this day.

Nolte – Dirty Little Emmy Secret: Trump Supporters Much More Racially Diverse Than Lily-White Television

According to the latest census figures, white people make up 61.3 percent of the American population. Rounding out those numbers, Hispanics (17.8 percent), blacks (13.3 percent), and Asians (5.7 percent), fill in most of the rest of our glorious melting pot. And yet…

The oh-so progressive left-wing television industry, the very same television industry that spent almost every minute of Sunday’s disastrously low-watched Emmy Award Show smugly blasting away at Trump and his supporters as unrepentant racists, looks nothing like America. Not even close.

In fact, the broad coalition of Trump’s “racist” supporters is much more racially diverse than the television industry.

According to a just-released study, minority actors make up only 11.4 percent of the lead actors in television roles. Things are not much better for supporting non-white roles, where white actors “account for about three-quarters of the scripted roles on cable and broadcast.”

In other words, while minorities make up nearly 40 percent of the American population, oh-so progressive Hollywood reduces the minority presence on television to a mere 11 percent in lead roles and a mere 25 percent in all roles.

Let us now compare Hollywood’s horrible record of racial diversity on television to the racial diversity of those Hollywood relentlessly blasts as racists, meaning: those awful Trump Supporters.

Only 58 percent of Trump supporters are white. Of that remaining non-white 42 percent, eight percent are black, while 29 percent are Hispanic.

Compare that to the 89% of lead television roles and 75% of all television roles that are white.

Things are not much better for Hollywood minorities behind-the-scenes:

Minorities saw dips in film writing credits (2.7 percentage points) and film directing credits (2.8 percentage points) compared with last year’s report. In the meantime, the number of people of color in leading roles remained stagnant — despite the release of pictures such as “Straight Outta Compton” and “Furious 7” in the study year.​

Oh, and while a full 42% of Trump supporters are women, in oh-so progressive Hollywood:

Women were underrepresented behind the scenes as well, making up 4.2% of directors, 13.2% of writers, 20.7% of producers, and just 1.7% of composers. There were only 34 unique female directors that released films between 2007 and 2016 (excluding 2011).​

If you honestly want to see a group of people that looks like America, spend some time with Trump supporters, and stay out of Stephen Colbert’s lily-white country club.

This reminds me of the arguments I used to have with an ex-Whyzzat user whom I will not name. He/she was quick to call others racist and acted as if he/she was an authority on race relations, yet he/she lived in a gated community in Whitelandia.
 
Last edited:
At least she didn't "commit suicide" with 3 bullets to the back of the head and floating down the river.

Conservative Co-Host Jedediah Bila Exits ‘The View’

Last week, during Hillary Clinton’s appearance on the show to promote her new tell-all, What Happen, Bila called the former Democratic candidate “tone deaf” and drew attention to Democrats who criticized Clinton for blaming everyone but herself for losing the election.

“To be fair, it hasn’t just been Republicans who have taken issue with the writing of this book. Some Democrats have come out as well,” Bila told Clinton.

She only lost her job and not her life. She's one lucky woman.
 
Suddenly Democrats are defending tax breaks for the top 1/10th of 1%ers!!

Liberals are suddenly defending federal subsidies to the ultra-lucrative NFL, even though player average income of $1.9 million has them squarely in the wealthiest ten percent of one-percenters.

For all the liberal hand-wringing about conservative economics providing tax breaks for the job creators of the country, now that Breitbart reported on a conservative who suggested removing subsidies for the NFL, the left has taken to defending those tax breaks. It’s unclear whether they’re ignorant of, or deliberately ignoring the fact that players are not job creators, and also are literally in the highest echelon of the one-percenters who were the greatest enemy of progress not so long ago. The NFL was operated as a non-profit for over 70 years, so virtually all of the league’s subsidies filtered down to teams and players.

Conservative Rep. Mo Brooks’ recommendation is a response to the ongoing NFL debacle. It seems the player protest has hit a tipping point among fans and lawmakers alike, particularly since it’s been established that anybody who dares defy the liberal mob is villainized, to the point a former Army Ranger has been forced to publicly apologize for observing the national anthem. The team’s goal was to not make a statement, but this sort of public and media response to a U.S. soldier standing for the anthem, in a venue called “Soldier Field” of all things, is a very clear statement; disagreement for any reason will not be tolerated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top