- Joined
- May 17, 2005
- Messages
- 12,256
- Reaction score
- 2,693
faethor said:I have the question why/how did the City put themselves in this position? It would seem about 30+% of the $100K is healthcare.
You are making an assumption that is probably similar to the assumption that you were "supposed" to make from this limited information. We really don't know what "cost of a teacher" means and for some reason no-one felt it necessary to break this down.
By analogy:
The cost of a US soldier in Afghanistan is $1,000,000 a year. Since a soldier's salary is around $20,000 that means they must be getting one heck of a benefits package. We should cut their pay!!!