Socialist beats top-ranking Democrat

And that's where I was confused. Those two tweets are not in contradiction.

Yes they are. Either you are against Corporatism, or you are not. The first part says she's against it, the second part only that just that certain parameters should have been met first.

By the way, "Occupation of Palestine" is the legally correct and internationally recognized state of the Palestinian territories that remain under Israeli military rule.

...but it's a snippet of a talking point. When asked to expand on her thoughts, she runs out of script and is forced to admit she doesn't understand her position.
 
Yes they are. Either you are against Corporatism, or you are not. The first part says she's against it, the second part only that just that certain parameters should have been met first.
That is your reading, not her writing.


...but it's a snippet of a talking point. When asked to expand on her thoughts, she runs out of script and is forced to admit she doesn't understand her position.
Maybe - or she senses a trap and tries to back pedal before she gets called anti-semitic.[/QUOTE]
 
IBD: Socialist 'It' Candidate Ocasio-Cortez Rips 'Unregulated' Uber, Then Spends $4,000 On ... Uber

46491925_10156773734303875_8420537581447413760_n.jpg
 
The shine is coming off the media's newest darling.

FACT CHECK: NY Times RIPS Cortez’ Claim Pentagon Could Pay $32T 'Medicare for All'

Even the mainstream media piled on incoming Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ recent comments that Pentagon spending errors could largely fund a ‘Medicare for All’ healthcare system; with the New York Times calling the claim ‘misleading.’

“Representative-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the rising liberal star, cited a figure that refers to nearly two decades of internal financial adjustments, not actual spending,” writes the Times.

“For starters, the combined Pentagon budget from 1998 to 2015 was $9.2 trillion. One study by a libertarian economic think tank found that ‘Medicare for all’ legislation by Senator Bernie Sanders, independent of Vermont, would cost the federal government $32.6 trillion over 10 years,” adds the author.



-edit-

Wapo:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s $21 trillion mistake

The Pinocchio Test
Swing and a miss!

Ocasio-Cortez is not the first Twitter user to mangle information from a news report. But it’s unconvincing to try to pass this off as a rhetorical point being misread. She cited the $21 trillion figure and said “66% of Medicare for All could have been funded already by the Pentagon.”

That’s a direct comparison. It’s badly flawed. The same article she referenced on Twitter would have set her straight. The tweet is still up, probably causing confusion. So we will award Four Pinocchios to Ocasio-Cortez.


Four Pinocchios
QV3BGZUD6FDBFNBZU7K2IY63XU.jpg
 
Last edited:
“For starters, the combined Pentagon budget from 1998 to 2015 was $9.2 trillion. One study by a libertarian economic think tank found that ‘Medicare for all’ legislation by Senator Bernie Sanders, independent of Vermont, would cost the federal government $32.6 trillion over 10 years,” adds the author.

$100,000 per year per person? I'm gonna reuse your graphic.

Four Pinocchios
QV3BGZUD6FDBFNBZU7K2IY63XU.jpg
 
$100,000 per year per person? I'm gonna reuse your graphic.

Four Pinocchios
QV3BGZUD6FDBFNBZU7K2IY63XU.jpg

You just "pulled an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez".

Read the quote again.

"would cost the federal government $32.6 trillion over 10 years"

You need to divide your assumption by 10. Actually, even that is to simplistic since it assumes the population in 2030 would be the same as 2018.
 
You just "pulled an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez".

Read the quote again.

"would cost the federal government $32.6 trillion over 10 years"

You need to divide your assumption by 10. Actually, even that is to simplistic since it assumes the population in 2030 would be the same as 2018.

Fair enough. $10,000 a year. Still wrong. $10,000 is about the average premium for a family - and insurers don't quote rates that will lose them money. Individual rate is about $4000 a year. Canvasing government healthcare around the world shows that the rate per individual is at most half of what Americans pay - so instead of paying $10,000 to the insurance company every year you would pay $5,000 more in taxes - a saving of $5,000 a year. I don't know too much about how the various plans work but deductibles look pretty high - so how does that work with doctor's visits?

Anyway, the point is, the people are already paying for their medical, but they are also paying armies of bureaucrats to shuffle paper and fight each other in court. Government programs reduce that overhead and push down on costs so save money over all. It still has to be paid for but it costs less.
 
Fair enough. $10,000 a year. Still wrong. $10,000 is about the average premium for a family - and insurers don't quote rates that will lose them money. Individual rate is about $4000 a year. Canvasing government healthcare around the world shows that the rate per individual is at most half of what Americans pay - so instead of paying $10,000 to the insurance company every year you would pay $5,000 more in taxes - a saving of $5,000 a year. I don't know too much about how the various plans work but deductibles look pretty high - so how does that work with doctor's visits?

This subject is complex enough it may warrant a thread of its own. I think considering anticipated population growth and inflation, it would be more like $8,500 per person in the first year. But I'm not going to do the mental gymnastics to figure out their exact methods, not read the Libertarian think tank's papers at this point. For the sake of this thread we'll just say $10k.

That seems a little high, but not much. The US medical system is an absolute mess that got 10 times worse under Obama. My work based family plan cost literally doubled throughout Obama's 8 years in office. What people see taken out of their work check towards medical is not the full cost of the insurance. Companies usually pay much more into insurance than the employee ever sees. This is called "Burden". With my last company I got to see what employee burden was, which was 32.8% of the employee's salary. If you make $100K/year, they company also allocates an additional $32k towards benefits that the employee never sees or is taxed on. A lion's share of the Burden goes towards various medical/dental/vision insurance. Higher paid employees force more burden (and usually pay more out of pocket), while lower paid employees account for less. Ironically most corporate pay structure is a form of socialism.

Almost all insurances have a crap ton of deductibles and copays. It is not unusual for an person to have to meet a $4,000 deductible before the insurance company will pay a dime. I'm talking about a typical company plan. That all started under Obama's presidency BTW, it never used to be that way before Obama. Even after the deductible is met, patients are still responsible for other fees like a percentage of doctor bills (20-30% is common), prescription costs, you name it. That's not even getting into dental. Dental insurance is a complete joke, but you have to have it just for some sort of artificial discount. Eye glasses insurance is an even bigger joke. It's such a joke that i don't even enroll in my company's plan. I just pay out of pocket.

Then you have the fact that a portion of the country does not have insurance, sometimes completely due to their own will and not because they can't afford it. The simple fact is it is law that emergency rooms cannot turn away anyone. They cannot ask for insurance before seeing a patient, and they cannot ask for payment at that time. A portion of the population uses the emergency room as their health care plan. Even people with cancer getting kemo treatments use the emergency room. It's not ideal for catastrophic medical needs, but it is a fact of what is going on. The vast majority of the billing for emergency room visits go unpaid by the patient.

Additionally, all of the medical providers of any type are gaming the system. All of the costs for everything has skyrocketed. There are a number of reasons, but it all boils down to the fact that free market capitalism does not exist in US healthcare. Well, almost does not exist. There is a tiny submarket for cash customers, but they are hard to find. I know it exists because a close friend dealth with testicular cancer about 5 years back and he had no insurance. He found a small support group that helped identify providers that accepted cash. Those providers were a fraction of the cost of going through insurance. I do mean a fraction. For the really expensive procedure(s), he even had some leeway to haggle the price down. Problem is, very, very few places accept cash any longer.

Finally, once every man, woman and child is fully covered no questions asked, the volume of visits will skyrocket.

Like I said, this could get long winded and may require a new thread. I don't think the $10k/person figure is all that far off.
 
Finally, once every man, woman and child is fully covered no questions asked, the volume of visits will skyrocket.

Volume might go up if people are currently avoiding seeing a doctor, but people who feel well don't go to the doctor much - but sometimes people who really should go to the doctor don't feel unwell enough to bear the expense, then end up with much more expensive problems.
 
DEVELOPING: Ocasio-Cortez THREATENS to ‘Subpoena' Trump Jr. for 'TROLLING'

33xj05g.jpg

(my screenshot in case she deletes the Tweet)

Cortez’ comments come days after she came under fire from both parties for directly comparing members of the ‘migrant caravan’ in Tijuana with “Jewish families” who fled the Second World War.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Threatens Donald Trump Jr. with Subpoena for Making Fun of Her. Which is Actually Illegal.


This isn't the Soviet Union or even Venezuela, lady. If this were a Republican making this threat, it would be front page news and 24/7 coverage on the Liberal Media. We'll see if a Democrat is actually held accountable.
 
Huh, Ocasio-Cortez caused my auto correct to come up with Occasional-Cortex...

This AI stuff is starting to get scary.

Either way, this woman seems to come off as the left wing equivalent of Sarah Palin.
 
Huh, Ocasio-Cortez caused my auto correct to come up with Occasional-Cortex...

This AI stuff is starting to get scary.

Either way, this woman seems to come off as the left wing equivalent of Sarah Palin.

Meh, Sarah Palin really isn't as loopy as the Liberal Media made her out to be. But that's not really a battle I feel the need to fight.
 
I wasn't thinking so much along the lines of supposed loopiness as much as being as being a bit slow.
 
Last edited:
This CAN’T be real life

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez can’t figure out why she’s not allowed to take presents from people or crash for free at a friend’s place because she can’t afford a place to rent until she starts making the big bucks as a ‘public servant’.

In fact, she says her mind is blown over it.





 
She actually does have something of a point despite being in the wrong. A shame she's made so many goofs up to this point that it gets buried by her own buffoonery.
 
She actually does have something of a point despite being in the wrong. A shame she's made so many goofs up to this point that it gets buried by her own buffoonery.

Yup. It is cringe-worthy watching her flop around like a fish out of water. It is astounding to think she had no idea she could not accept direct gifts and bribes as a public servant. Yes the Clintons of the world have gamed the system to go from insolvent to closing in on Billionaire status, but those crooks are part of the Deep State and don't take their pay-to-play money directly.
 
She actually does have something of a point despite being in the wrong. A shame she's made so many goofs up to this point that it gets buried by her own buffoonery.

Yup, the comparisons to Sarah Palin are pretty spot on. Inexperienced, naive, a bit slow on the uptake, and suddenly thrust into a position of prominence in which certain powerful people have a lot that can be gained by making her look like an even bigger moron than she actually is.
 
Back
Top