Elon Musk watch (was Elon Muskrat watch)

Dark MAGA is created.


Elon is the only Billionaire trying to help the victims in NC and elsewhere that FEMA is not just not helping, but actively blocking rescue efforts.
 

Fake AI: Elon Musk’s Robots at Tesla Robotaxi Event Relied on Human Controllers​

Tesla’s Optimus robots, which played a significant role in Elon Musk’s extravagant robotaxi reveal last week, were not fully autonomous and relied on human intervention, according to attendees and analysts.

The Verge reports that at Tesla’s highly anticipated “We, Robot” event, held in conjunction with the reveal of its Cybercab robotaxi, the company showcased its Optimus humanoid robots which interacted with the crowd, serving drinks, playing games with guests, and even dancing. The robots’ ability to engage in conversation and respond to verbal and visual cues left many attendees impressed. However, it has come to light that the robots’ seemingly advanced capabilities were largely due to human assistance behind the scenes.

Attendee Robert Scoble, who initially posted about the robots’ impressive performance, later clarified that he had learned from an engineer that the robots were being “remote assisted” by humans. This revelation was further supported by Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas, who noted in a report that the robots “relied on tele-ops (human intervention).”
 
Robert said:
I have no idea if any of the claims here are true but, depressingly, not a single one of them would surprise me.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1849138260494389631
Click to expand...

I wonder if this person understand that tweets qualify for libel and their target is the richest man in the world? I'd like to see proof of a single one of these being true. None of it passes the smell test to people who have been paying attention.

Which one of these statements do you feel could be possibly true? You say you have no idea if true, but wouldn't be surprised? None of these make any sense except maybe the very last one in a general vague sense, since lawfare has actually been threatened against Musk by the left. That said, supporting a candidate is not "buying a president", certainly not the only one of 2 candidates that actually won a primary.
 
Robert said:
I have no idea if any of the claims here are true but, depressingly, not a single one of them would surprise me.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1849138260494389631
Click to expand...
Diddy apparently made a $20million investment in twitter. That's about 0.045% of the purchase price. If 1 is true and2 is true then they likely count as the same thing. But many people knew Ghislaine and many well connected people called Epstein friend. There's a bit of pot/kettle-itis going on there.
 
The "Elon was friends with" claim seems to be overblown. There is a photo from Vanity Fair do in which they both appear and a report from a source who claims Ghislaine asked Musk about removing her information from the internet.
 
redrumloa said:
None of it passes the smell test to people who have been paying attention.

Which one of these statements do you feel could be possibly true?
Click to expand...
A quick google search turned up this story from last year:
Elon Musk has been subpoenaed by the US Virgin Islands in a lawsuit accusing a Wall Street bank of enabling Jeffrey Epstein to sex traffic women.

It calls on the Tesla boss to hand over any documents showing communication between him, JP Morgan Chase bank and Epstein, who died in 2019.
Click to expand...
So, number 1 is demonstrably true.

According to Fluffy, Diddy chipped in $20m for Twitter. It might only be a fraction of a percent but hardly pocket change and it would make number 2 technically true as well.

You say you have no idea if true, but wouldn't be surprised?
Click to expand...
Yes; now that at least two of them seem to be true, I'm not remotely surprised.

-edit-
I would add that the detail behind the statements seems to be far less sensational than the Tweet implies, even if the statements are factual. Fluffy used the term "overblown" and I'd go along with that. However, had they been as sensational as implied, I still wouldn't be surprised.
 
Last edited:
redrumloa said:
None of these make any sense except maybe the very last one in a general vague sense, since lawfare has actually been threatened against Musk by the left.
Click to expand...

This is the modern left, indistinguishable from the worst times of the Soviet Union.

464561327_1137985281020542_9023099522430772570_n.jpg

I don't think some of ya'll really understand just how far on the wrong side of history you are. The left is a cult completely desperate to be lied to and want all wrong thinkers locked up or assassinated.
 
Robert said:
A quick google search turned up this story from last year:

So, number 1 is demonstrably true.

According to Fluffy, Diddy chipped in $20m for Twitter. It might only be a fraction of a percent but hardly pocket change and it would make number 2 technically true as well.

Yes; now that at least two of them seem to be true, I'm not remotely surprised.

-edit-
I would add that the detail behind the statements seems to be far less sensational than the Tweet implies, even if the statements are factual. Fluffy used the term "overblown" and I'd go along with that. However, had they been as sensational as implied, I still wouldn't be surprised.
Click to expand...
Overblown - but deliberately for deceptive purposes - cherry picking molehills to inflate into mountains.
Diddy putting a bet on Musk's twitter deal is incriminating to the same degree as "Hilter liked dogs" or "Stalin also drank water". People invest in things for their own reasons. It's mentioned only to baselessly imply that for this paltry amount there was a quid pro quo negotiated. If Diddy was trying to buy Musk with his teensy investment it would imply that he didn't have actual useful dirt on Musk. The much bigger, partner level investors are more germane. We could ask maybe why Saudi Princes prefer Trump - perhaps a more interesting and productive, but impolitic angle.
The subpoena item is even more misleading (misinforming?) as is stated to imply that it is Elon that is being investigated over Epstein. Instead, it turns out, that it's JP Morgan that is being investigated for links to Epstein and Elon was subpeonaed to supply any documents he may have that would support that investigation. This is a threat to JP Morgan and their CEO has clearly thrown his support behind Kamala (is there a quid pro quo?) https://www.reuters.com/world/us/jp...harris-administration-nyt-reports-2024-10-22/

So we have:
technically true but meaningless,
technically true but misdirection, and
probably not true, but manufactured out of an old photo that showed them next to each other at some old event that the elites got invited to.

I've spent more time on this than it merits but it's basically rage bait to rouse the followers and basically will fail to move the needle on anyone not already in the fold.
 
Robert said:
Isn't that this entire website?
Click to expand...
touché
Specifically though, googling to see what's there to find there is approximately nothing (or its opposite) there. Approaching in good faith to find it was made in bad faith. I suppose "worth it" is very subjective.
 
cecilia said:
this might be illegal
Click to expand...
Won't matter even if it is:
Judge Angelo Foglietta said he would place the lawsuit on hold while a federal court considers whether to take up the case.
Musk's bid to move the case frees him to continue the giveaway, because the matter likely won't be resolved until after Tuesday's election.
Click to expand...
 
Once upon a time Elon Musk launched an electric car into space as a space junk vanity project. The reactions were as such:
Elon is the real life Tony Stark.
I want to have Elon's baby.
Greatest thing humanity has ever done.

Now Elon has a company launching satellites with real life humanitarian function. He's provided free internet to people in war torn areas such as Ukraine and hurricane ravaged areas abandoned by the Brandon administration such as NC. What reaction do we get?

Is Elon Musk's Starlink polluting space? Researchers call for the FCC to pause launches​


Hmm, I wonder why the change in attitude? I guess it will remain a big mystery! :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top