Ready for the next Ice Age? Winter is coming.

redrumloa said:
...with records dating back a little over 100 years? There have been living creatures on the Earth for billions of years, and your "proof" a variation in a sample size less than 0.0000001% of earth's history?

There's a reason Geologists do not go along with this obvious scam.
Click to expand...
The dinosaurs existed for millions of years before they didn't. It's almost certain that something will be alive on the earth in a few thousand or million years, but there's no guarantee that humans will be among them.
Imagine if all of this warming was completely natural (and it soon will be overwhelmed by natural processes as the carbon comes out of the permafrost). Wouldn't we still want to know what we can do about it? Is "it's natural" a good reason to ignore it? Death from smallpox was natural too, once upon a time.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
The dinosaurs existed for millions of years before they didn't. It's almost certain that something will be alive on the earth in a few thousand or million years, but there's no guarantee that humans will be among them.
Imagine if all of this warming was completely natural (and it soon will be overwhelmed by natural processes as the carbon comes out of the permafrost). Wouldn't we still want to know what we can do about it? Is "it's natural" a good reason to ignore it? Death from smallpox was natural too, once upon a time.
Click to expand...

If you are suggesting that we go back to REAL science, I'm all for it. What we are currently discussing has absolutely zero science behind it. We are firmly in politics when discussing AGW, or any of the various new names. They made a declaration "the science is settled" (which is not how science works), and now want us all submit to global Communism. All the figureheads will openly admit, accidentally or not, this is not about science, it is about some sort of "equality", aka Communism.

If there was a way to reverse the corruption and return climate science to actual science, I'd be for it. As it is now, the only groups of "scientists" that get funding, are those who "hide the decline" etc. Scientists who refuse to walk lockstep are blacklisted. Start a movement to bring "science" back to science, and I'll join you.
 
Here's the UK Met office "hiding the decline" today *again* so they "get funding", along with those other well known, only-doing-it-for-the-funding hoaxsters, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, what with their records only going back 100-odd years, the shysters:
Next year is likely to be another of the hottest on record, with global temperatures forecast to be more than 1.1C above the pre-industrial average, according to estimates from the Met Office.

The forecast for 2020 is based on observations of trends over recent yearsthat have seen a series of years more than 1C above pre-industrial levels, and bearing what meteorologists said was the “clear fingerprint” of human-induced global heating.

That trend is likely to continue in 2020, the Met Office predicted on Thursday, barring unforeseeable events such as a major volcanic eruption, which would have a cooling effect from the dust thrown into the atmosphere.
Click to expand...

I haven't made my mind up whether the level of cognitively-dissonant, tinfoil-hat-idiocy on display in this thread is funny or tragic. A bit of both, I suppose, but I find myself increasingly leaning towards funny.
:lol: :pint:
 
redrumloa said:
If you are suggesting that we go back to REAL science, I'm all for it.
Click to expand...

The basic science is very simple. Earth receives energy from the sun and radiates it back out into space, just like the other objects in the solar system do. The moon, for example, is at the same distance from the sun as the earth (to within 0.25% at the extremes) but the daytime surface temperatures can reach 106C while the nighttime temps get down to -180C. We don't get those temperature swings down here on Earth, and the reason why has been known for more than 150 years.
 
Davos Forum Elites to Demand Immediate Global Action on ‘Climate Change’

corporate-jets-640x480.jpg


Organizers expect some 3,000 corporate and government representatives to fly in from around the world to broach climate issues at the luxury ski resort, with a squadron of some 1700 private jets providing transport for the bulk of the attendees.

They jet set around in ever increasing luxury, while you are supposed to accept downsizing to a mud hut with no electricity, eating Soylent Green. Biggest scam in human history.
 
redrumloa said:
Biggest scam in human history, right out in front of you to see.

183 Arsonists Have Been Arrested Over Australia’s Wildfire

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=490168505023170

AGW Cult members set fires across Australia, and Hollywood/Liberal Media propagandize it as "Muh Global Warming" for all the sheeple.

Apologies yet?
Click to expand...
I thought you wanted to get back to real science. I tried to start that http://whyzzat.com/threads/ready-for-the-next-ice-age-winter-is-coming.28048/page-36#post-100316 but maybe you missed it - or maybe you know where it goes.
 
Here's some real science published yesterday:

Using satellite data from the Landsat 5, 7 and 8 missions, we measured change in the spatial extent of subnival vegetation from 1993 to 2018.
... we show that there has been a weakly positive increase in the extent of subnival vegetation since 1993.
...The strongest trend in increased vegetation cover was between 5,000 metres and 5,500 metres altitude
Click to expand...

Flowers on Everest! What's not to like?

...the strength and direction of impacts of vegetation expansion remain unknown.
Click to expand...

Ah, OK.
 
Robert said:
Surprised no one commented on that video - guess no one watched it. It's a pretty well made critique of climate science and reasonably convincing.
Well, it didn't convince me but I thought it would be right up Denier Street and perhaps generate some discussion. :D

Anyway, here's another juicy headline for you;
Amazon: Parts of rainforest 'emitting more CO2 than they absorb'
Click to expand...

I haven't followed this thread closely in recent months. It seems to go in a never ending circle. I'll watch the video some time soon.
 
'The only solution for climate change is letting the human race become extinct'

“The basic premise of the book is that we’re in the age of the Anthropocene, humanity has caused mass problems and one of them is creating this hierarchal world where white, male, heterosexual and able-bodied people are succeeding, and people of different races, genders, sexualities and those with disabilities are struggling to get that.

the book has generated discussion due to its joyful and optimistic tone, as it sets out a positive view for the future of Earth - without mankind.
Click to expand...

What could be more optimistic than suicide of mankind?

Could also be interpreted as a manifesto for genocide
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top