- Joined
- Apr 2, 2005
- Messages
- 14,933
- Reaction score
- 2,142
Which of the 10 Commandments do you disagree with? Just curious.
It's not about disagreeing with individual commandments, more forcing Christianity on everyone.Which of the 10 Commandments do you disagree with? Just curious.
As an aside, if I'm correct in inferring from your question that you agree with all ten, how do you go about enforcing no. 4
I'm not aware of any law passed making verses from the Quran on public building compulsory. If there is any such law, I'm equally opposed to it.Anything Muslim is OK
That's a one-couple personal choice. In the Western Isles you don't have that choice. If you're not Christian, tough tittie, you still don't get to do anything on a Sunday.-edit-
As for the Sabbath, I'm married to someone who is now a practicing Christian and who genuinely tries to abide by original scripture. The Sabbath is indeed supposed to be Saturday, like Jews practice. She doesn't cook or do manual labor from sunset Friday to sunset Saturday. It doesn't impact my life at all, except maybe I make my own meal one day.
Different over here. In Scotland the Catholic church is very much a protected and promoted species these days. We recently had a government sanctioned enquiry into child abuse in Scottish sporting institutions and the most popular sport in the country, football, was specifically not included. There was no explanation why but it just so happened that at the same time one of the biggest football clubs in the country was being sued in a class action over historic child abuse. That club has very close ties to the church. Purely coincidental I'm sure and nothing sinister.-edit #2-
Isn't it odd how the Catholic Church kiddy diddling scandal was (rightfully) such big news, but the public school kiddy diddling scandal is almost completely ignored despite being a far bigger scandal.
But can you mock it, or mock the Prophet?I'm not aware of any law passed making verses from the Quran on public building compulsory. If there is any such law, I'm equally opposed to it.
But can you mock it, or mock the Prophet?
Another travesty but not currently enshrined in any of our laws (that I'm aware of) and your question implies that a valid response to such religious idiocy is legislation decreeing more religious idiocy.But can you mock it, or mock the Prophet?
I thin you actually are in potential legal jeopardy in Scotland if you mock the prophet. Your new Hate Crime Act has language aimed at criminalizing language that could be considered inflammatory or offensive on the subjective say so of protected groups that hear those utterances (or who may be exposed to them at a later time) and that Islamophobia is a grounds for prosecution and that all of the Scottish parties have accepted the following formal definition of Islamophobia (which sounds like it's come straight out of a first year college -ism course):Another travesty but not currently enshrined in any of our laws (that I'm aware of) and your question implies that a valid response to such religious idiocy is legislation decreeing more religious idiocy.
This was already possible before the farcical new act (which will probably be repealed when the SNP are no longer in charge). As has been discussed on here before, people have had prison terms for such as far back as a decade ago, although, once again, it is almost always Catholicism that receives such "protection", rather than islam. Back in 2008 you had public figures, including a politician who has recently been found to have fraudulently claimed £11k+ in expenses, demanding anyone singing the Hokey-Cokey is arrested for "anti-Catholic bigotry".I thin you actually are in potential legal jeopardy in Scotland if you mock the prophet. Your new Hate Crime Act has language aimed at criminalizing language that could be considered inflammatory or offensive on the subjective say so of protected groups that hear those utterances
Have been since I was a child. Scotland has always been a basket case when it comes to religion.You are already living in a theocracy.
When Biden rambles it's because he's a doddery old man.
“He seemed a little disoriented. He did get stronger as the debate went on."
For me? Because Biden rambled exactly like the doddery old man I said he was? I'm assuming you're getting at something else but, if so, you'll have to explain it to this doddery old man.Should be a wakeup alarm for ya.
Robert said:
For me? Because Biden rambled exactly like the doddery old man I said he was? I'm assuming you're getting at something else but, if so, you'll have to explain it to this doddery old man.
Yes, I believe Hillary was arrested in 2017 just as Q predicted.
Michelle Obama is a man pretending to be a woman.
Trump is, of course, not only innocent but the greatest president the USA has ever seen. I know it, you know it, and Q knows it.
He never diddled the books to cover up paying off the porn star he shagged around the time his wife was having a baby. In fact he never even shagged her, let alone paid her off. That was all made up by the cabal.
He never committed sexual assault either. Made up by the deep state
As for that "grab 'em by the pussy" stuff? Doctored audio again - he never said it. And even if he did, he didn't mean it.
The election was stolen from Trump because the cabal control the voting machines and are scared that, after the amazing swamp draining he completed during his first term, another 4 years would see their adrenochrome-drinking, face-eating, baby-raping antics exposed.
Despite this injustice, he never tacitly encouraged his knuckle-dragging followers to storm the capital. The audio is fake.
Nor did he twiddle his thumbs whilst people were dying during said incident.
In fact, he did everything in his power to stop it immediately, but was deliberately prevented from doing so by the cabal.
Nor did he ever express a preference for collective punishment.
When Biden rambles it's because he's a doddery old man.
When Trump rambles, he's not actually rambling but dropping coded 5D-chess breadcrumbs.
Because Trump is not only a good man, but the chosen one.
All this and more are things the Q followers believe. Of course, you wouldn't believe any of that rubbish, would you?
Not particularly but feel free to elaborate instead of projecting.Here's the whole context. You included it in your mockery of Q-Anon.
I hope that helps.
Obama still backs him.