- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
- Messages
- 7,713
- Reaction score
- 2,588
let me help:please explain your view on this?
he's an inhuman moron
let me help:please explain your view on this?
let me help:
he's an inhuman moron
Maybe you might think some of the other videos he's posted are fun, and inspirational .... because he takes the fun to a new levelsee and im not having fun when people do that so it isnt fun, doesnt meet the standard of fun, and social norms tend to agree....
He is inspirational because he is not afraid to be himself." -Destiney St. Denis
It has 165 members so far."for people who are fascinated with him, or anything that goes against society, and their morals, or who would just want to have sex with him." -Allyssa Kerr
. I understand you may idolize Dahmer but most atheists do not.
“if a person doesn’t think that there is a God to be accountable to, then what’s the point of trying to modify your behavior to keep it within acceptable ranges?” Jeffrey Dahmer
. The atheists actions are less greedy because they aren't doing it in hopes they'll win favors from Big Sky Daddy.
It is important that when we look at the statistics it's atheists who are under represented in prison compared to their % of the population at large.
a moral nihilist would say that killing someone, for whatever reason, is neither inherently right nor inherently wrong. Moral nihilists consider morality to be constructed, a complex set of rules and recommendations that may give a psychological, social, or economical advantage to its adherents, but is otherwise without universal or even relative truth in any sense
.Here's a good launching point that atheists are not only less greedy they are more generous link
You asserted that Missionaries aren't greedy. They are as all the religious ones are doing it with the benefit of helping themselves get into heaven. It's not true that any atheists, except 1, are eating people. Nor are all mass murders atheists. Gein was a Christian. Gacy was a Catholic who read the bible as he was killing his victims.These atheist actions are because they like to have fun, and they've decided the most fun they can have is engaging in necrophilia
But wait you told us Christians are more moral. But now they aren't? Can you explain what you are trying to assert?If they're in prison I'm pretty sure there is some serious religious morality they violated to get there, and they have a big incentive to reform before they go to the parole hearing
Thats more a reflection of the composite of society. Church goers attend weekly meetings where they are asked to donate. There is nothing similar for atheists. We have no collective church to attend. If all is equal, like in the experiments, and an equal opportunity is made for both it's the Atheists who come out on top. In reality most Atheists realize we have 1 chance at this life and appreciate it deeper and aren't greedy in the way you state. Heck it's notable that Enrons CEO Skilling attended church on a regular basis in Houston. His Christianity, if anything, excused his immorality.ROFL atheist don't give more that a token amount to charities
So a jury that didn't have the benefit of sky faerie would just figure that they could let him go and there wouldn't be any danger of anyone they know getting eaten?Only because there were too many believers of the invisible sky god on the jury indoctrinated with commandments and morality
Church goers attend weekly meetings where they are asked to donate. There is nothing similar for atheists. We have no collective church to attend.
It's not true that any atheists, except 1, are eating people.
a moral nihilist would say that killing someone, for whatever reason, is neither inherently right nor inherently wrong. Moral nihilists consider morality to be constructed, a complex set of rules and recommendations that may give a psychological, social, or economical advantage to its adherents, but is otherwise without universal or even relative truth in any sense
. They give because someone bugs them about it weekly. Atheists don't have this going on. They give because in front of their watchful eye of friends they need to keep up th pretense. There is no Atheist friend holding a social relationship hot poker to your feet.life is not equal, it's not an experiment, they attend, and donate time and money because they make the time, its important to them
In general I agree with you here. It's just a matter of fact that a fair number of Christians act like it does.Christianity does not excuse immorality, forgiveness requires repentance and penance
So a jury that didn't have the benefit of sky faerie would just figure that they could let him go and there wouldn't be any danger of anyone they know getting eaten?
a moral nihilist would say that killing someone, is the same as killing a cow, there is a social advantage to not being caught killing someone, but it just a matter of risk versus reward.That's why killing and eating a cow is not considered a bad thing ... but killing and eating a PERSON ... is.
. It is the case that not all atheists are moral nihilists. Nor are all nihilists atheists. There are Christian nihilists. And certainly if you read Neitzsche you'd know he views Christianity as Nihilistic as it values reward in heaven over anything on earth. Making all Christians do as fairly pointless here as its all a bribe for Sky Daddy.A moral nihilist would.
Seriously? Quote Christ's words where he said this. Gospel Chapter and verse please. I've got my Bible waiting.But the sky faerie says that, if he "did the crime" he must "do the time"
. They give because someone bugs them about it weekly. Atheists don't have this going on. They give because in front of their watchful eye of friends they need to keep up th pretense.
.There is no Atheist friend holding a social relationship hot poker to your feet.
The Ten Commandments represent the moral and legal foundation of civil legal codes in Western CivilizationSeriously? Quote Christ's words where he said this. Gospel Chapter and verse please. I've got my Bible waiting.
BULLSHITThe Ten Commandments represent the moral and legal foundation of civil legal codes in Western Civilization
Oath:BULLSHIT
This idea is pure bunk
Swear to not bear false witness in a court of law doesn't prove your claim that society is built on the 10 commandments. Nor is bearing false witness illegal in most cases. That idea goes against free speech. You do realize Fox News won a court case where they claimed lying is their right? Political speech isn't protected. Just because a candidate says X we aren't allowed to remove him by police action if he doesn't follow through.Oath:
"Do you solemnly swear or affirm that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you god?"