Georgia, the Olympics, the US armada and Iran

[metalman]

Many here don't like to think that the US plays any geopolitical games to control access to and control over commodities. Would those people feel that the accusation would carry weightif Russia was doing it?

And from the opposite of the fence, Where are the marchers for peace?.

Beaten long ago. We haven't seen any big marches since they failed to stop the invasion of Iraq. It's been shown to be monumentally pointless. Gone is the pretense that leaders listen to the people.

Did the UN approve this and where does international law stand on the Russian attack on Georgia?? No Blood for Oil!

When Russian tanks roll, Peace marchers stay home, because Russia is liberating the Georgians who are being victimized by the nasty evil American imperialists into becoming more democratic and more economically successful than Russia. Therefore, Russia has every right to assert her influence in the region and protect her interests and restore the Russian geopolitical territory.

 

[metalman]

Many here don't like to think that the US plays any geopolitical games to control access to and control over commodities. Would those people feel that the accusation would carry weightif Russia was doing it?

And from the opposite of the fence, Where are the marchers for peace?.

Beaten long ago. We haven't seen any big marches since they failed to stop the invasion of Iraq. It's been shown to be monumentally pointless. Gone is the pretense that leaders listen to the people.

Did the UN approve this and where does international law stand on the Russian attack on Georgia?? No Blood for Oil!

When Russian tanks roll, Peace marchers stay home, because Russia is liberating the Georgians who are being victimized by the nasty evil American imperialists into becoming more democratic and more economically successful than Russia. Therefore, Russia has every right to assert her influence in the region and protect her interests and restore the Russian geopolitical territory.

 

[Robert]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Aren't they always?
:roll:

 

[Robert]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Aren't they always?
:roll:

 

[Robert]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Aren't they always?
:roll:

 

[Robert]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Aren't they always?
:roll:

 

[Robert]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Aren't they always?
:roll:

 

[Robert]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Aren't they always?
:roll:

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Many here don't like to think that the US plays any geopolitical games to control access to and control over commodities. Would those people feel that the accusation would carry weightif Russia was doing it?

And from the opposite of the fence, Where are the marchers for peace?.

Normally, one only protests against their own government. If our government support this war, it's indeed strange no-one's protesting.

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Many here don't like to think that the US plays any geopolitical games to control access to and control over commodities. Would those people feel that the accusation would carry weightif Russia was doing it?

And from the opposite of the fence, Where are the marchers for peace?.

Normally, one only protests against their own government. If our government support this war, it's indeed strange no-one's protesting.

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Many here don't like to think that the US plays any geopolitical games to control access to and control over commodities. Would those people feel that the accusation would carry weightif Russia was doing it?

And from the opposite of the fence, Where are the marchers for peace?.

Normally, one only protests against their own government. If our government support this war, it's indeed strange no-one's protesting.

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Many here don't like to think that the US plays any geopolitical games to control access to and control over commodities. Would those people feel that the accusation would carry weightif Russia was doing it?

And from the opposite of the fence, Where are the marchers for peace?.

Normally, one only protests against their own government. If our government support this war, it's indeed strange no-one's protesting.

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Many here don't like to think that the US plays any geopolitical games to control access to and control over commodities. Would those people feel that the accusation would carry weightif Russia was doing it?

And from the opposite of the fence, Where are the marchers for peace?.

Normally, one only protests against their own government. If our government support this war, it's indeed strange no-one's protesting.

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Many here don't like to think that the US plays any geopolitical games to control access to and control over commodities. Would those people feel that the accusation would carry weightif Russia was doing it?

And from the opposite of the fence, Where are the marchers for peace?.

Normally, one only protests against their own government. If our government support this war, it's indeed strange no-one's protesting.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Just when you thought the red threat was over.. :x

That comparison gets made all the time just like the comparison of whoever you don't like being compared to Hitler. It's almost always bull for the two reasons that the comparison is politically motivated and tenuous at best being used for nothing more than propaganda and that Chamberlain's deal and Hitler were not as simplistic as they are regarded today.

Plus, in what way is it appeasement to protect breakaway autonomous regions (that have been autonomous for almost 20 years) from being gobbled up in a hostile military takeover.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Just when you thought the red threat was over.. :x

That comparison gets made all the time just like the comparison of whoever you don't like being compared to Hitler. It's almost always bull for the two reasons that the comparison is politically motivated and tenuous at best being used for nothing more than propaganda and that Chamberlain's deal and Hitler were not as simplistic as they are regarded today.

Plus, in what way is it appeasement to protect breakaway autonomous regions (that have been autonomous for almost 20 years) from being gobbled up in a hostile military takeover.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Just when you thought the red threat was over.. :x

That comparison gets made all the time just like the comparison of whoever you don't like being compared to Hitler. It's almost always bull for the two reasons that the comparison is politically motivated and tenuous at best being used for nothing more than propaganda and that Chamberlain's deal and Hitler were not as simplistic as they are regarded today.

Plus, in what way is it appeasement to protect breakaway autonomous regions (that have been autonomous for almost 20 years) from being gobbled up in a hostile military takeover.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Just when you thought the red threat was over.. :x

That comparison gets made all the time just like the comparison of whoever you don't like being compared to Hitler. It's almost always bull for the two reasons that the comparison is politically motivated and tenuous at best being used for nothing more than propaganda and that Chamberlain's deal and Hitler were not as simplistic as they are regarded today.

Plus, in what way is it appeasement to protect breakaway autonomous regions (that have been autonomous for almost 20 years) from being gobbled up in a hostile military takeover.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Just when you thought the red threat was over.. :x

That comparison gets made all the time just like the comparison of whoever you don't like being compared to Hitler. It's almost always bull for the two reasons that the comparison is politically motivated and tenuous at best being used for nothing more than propaganda and that Chamberlain's deal and Hitler were not as simplistic as they are regarded today.

Plus, in what way is it appeasement to protect breakaway autonomous regions (that have been autonomous for almost 20 years) from being gobbled up in a hostile military takeover.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Parallels are being made with Neville Chamberlain's appeasing of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152012

Just when you thought the red threat was over.. :x

That comparison gets made all the time just like the comparison of whoever you don't like being compared to Hitler. It's almost always bull for the two reasons that the comparison is politically motivated and tenuous at best being used for nothing more than propaganda and that Chamberlain's deal and Hitler were not as simplistic as they are regarded today.

Plus, in what way is it appeasement to protect breakaway autonomous regions (that have been autonomous for almost 20 years) from being gobbled up in a hostile military takeover.